Comparison Overview

Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County

VS

Museums Association

Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County

Hjemkomst Center, Moorhead, MN, 56560, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.hcscconline.org

The Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County collects, preserves, and presents the history and culture of Clay County and the region. HCSCC also provides interpretation of the Hjemkomst Viking Ship, Hopperstad Stave Church Replica, and Red River Valley Exhibition and hosts traveling exhibits in 7,000 sq. feet of temporary exhibition space. The HCSCC is a community resource for 150,000 people in the Fargo-Moorhead metro area, and serves an average of 40,000 visitors a year from all over the world.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Museums Association

42 Clerkenwell Close, London, GB, EC1R 0AZ
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
https://www.museumsassociation.org/

A dynamic membership organisation and a vibrant network for everyone working in museums and heritage. The Museums Association exists to enhance the value of museums to society by sharing knowledge, developing skills, inspiring innovation and providing leadership. We advocate for museums, set ethical standards and run essential training and professional development for members wishing to further their careers. Our annual conference is Europe's largest event for museum and heritage professionals. We are the oldest museums association in the world, set up in 1889 to guard the interests of museums and galleries. Today we are still independently funded by our membership, which comprises museum professionals, freelancers and consultants, institutions and commercial members.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 98
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historical-&-cultural-society-of-clay-county.jpeg
Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museums-association.jpeg
Museums Association
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Museums Association
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Museums Association in 2026.

Incident History — Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Museums Association (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Museums Association cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historical-&-cultural-society-of-clay-county.jpeg
Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museums-association.jpeg
Museums Association
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Museums Association company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Museums Association company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County company.

In the current year, Museums Association company and Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Museums Association company nor Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Museums Association company nor Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Museums Association company nor Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County company nor Museums Association company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County nor Museums Association holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County company nor Museums Association company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Museums Association company employs more people globally than Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County nor Museums Association holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County nor Museums Association holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County nor Museums Association holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County nor Museums Association holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County nor Museums Association holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County nor Museums Association holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References