Comparison Overview

Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County

VS

Carnegie Museum of Natural History

Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County

Hjemkomst Center, Moorhead, MN, 56560, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

The Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County collects, preserves, and presents the history and culture of Clay County and the region. HCSCC also provides interpretation of the Hjemkomst Viking Ship, Hopperstad Stave Church Replica, and Red River Valley Exhibition and hosts traveling exhibits in 7,000 sq. feet of temporary exhibition space. The HCSCC is a community resource for 150,000 people in the Fargo-Moorhead metro area, and serves an average of 40,000 visitors a year from all over the world.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Carnegie Museum of Natural History

4400 FORBES AVE, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, US, 15213
Last Update: 2026-01-20
Between 750 and 799

Carnegie Museum of Natural History collects and cares for specimens and artifacts that document the history of life and human cultures. Today its dinosaur collection includes the world's largest collection of Jurassic dinosaurs and its Dinosaurs in Their Time exhibition offers the third largest collection of mounted, displayed dinosaurs in the United States (behind the Smithsonian's National Museum of Natural History and the American Museum of Natural History). Other major exhibits include Hillman Hall of Minerals and Gems, Alcoa Foundation Hall of American Indians, Polar World: Wyckoff Hall of Arctic Life, Walton Hall of Ancient Egypt, Benedum Hall of Geology, and Powdermill Nature Reserve, established by the museum in 1956 to serve as a field station for long-term studies of natural populations.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 208
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historical-&-cultural-society-of-clay-county.jpeg
Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/carnegie-museum-of-natural-history.jpeg
Carnegie Museum of Natural History
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Carnegie Museum of Natural History
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Carnegie Museum of Natural History in 2026.

Incident History — Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Carnegie Museum of Natural History (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Carnegie Museum of Natural History cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historical-&-cultural-society-of-clay-county.jpeg
Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/carnegie-museum-of-natural-history.jpeg
Carnegie Museum of Natural History
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County company and Carnegie Museum of Natural History company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Carnegie Museum of Natural History company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County company.

In the current year, Carnegie Museum of Natural History company and Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Carnegie Museum of Natural History company nor Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Carnegie Museum of Natural History company nor Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Carnegie Museum of Natural History company nor Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County company nor Carnegie Museum of Natural History company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County nor Carnegie Museum of Natural History holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County company nor Carnegie Museum of Natural History company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Carnegie Museum of Natural History company employs more people globally than Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County nor Carnegie Museum of Natural History holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County nor Carnegie Museum of Natural History holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County nor Carnegie Museum of Natural History holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County nor Carnegie Museum of Natural History holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County nor Carnegie Museum of Natural History holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County nor Carnegie Museum of Natural History holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H