Comparison Overview

Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County

VS

Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA)

Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County

Hjemkomst Center, Moorhead, MN, 56560, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.hcscconline.org

The Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County collects, preserves, and presents the history and culture of Clay County and the region. HCSCC also provides interpretation of the Hjemkomst Viking Ship, Hopperstad Stave Church Replica, and Red River Valley Exhibition and hosts traveling exhibits in 7,000 sq. feet of temporary exhibition space. The HCSCC is a community resource for 150,000 people in the Fargo-Moorhead metro area, and serves an average of 40,000 visitors a year from all over the world.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA)

264 South 23rd Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19103, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ccaha.org/

The Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) has grown to be one of the largest nonprofit conservation centers in the country. Its wide array of services, sophisticated treatment facilities, innovative approaches, and highly trained and experienced staff have earned it a prominent and respected place in the conservation field. Our mission is to provide expertise and leadership in the preservation of the world's cultural heritage. CCAHA specializes in the treatment of works of art and artifacts on paper, such as drawings, prints, maps, posters, historic wallpaper, photographs, rare books, scrapbooks, and manuscripts, along with related materials like parchment and papyrus. CCAHA also offers digital imaging services, on-site consultations, educational programs and seminars, internships, and emergency conservation services.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 43
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historical-&-cultural-society-of-clay-county.jpeg
Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/conservation-center-for-art-and-historic-artifacts.jpeg
Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA)
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) in 2025.

Incident History — Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historical-&-cultural-society-of-clay-county.jpeg
Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/conservation-center-for-art-and-historic-artifacts.jpeg
Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County company.

In the current year, Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) company and Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) company nor Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) company nor Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) company nor Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County company nor Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County nor Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County company nor Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) company employs more people globally than Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County nor Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County nor Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County nor Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County nor Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County nor Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Historical & Cultural Society of Clay County nor Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References