Comparison Overview

Historic Philadelphia, Inc.

VS

Great Plains Zoo

Historic Philadelphia, Inc.

601 Walnut St, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19106, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02

Founded in 1994 at the direction of Governor Edward G. Rendell, then Philadelphia’s mayor, Historic Philadelphia, Inc.’s (HPI) mission is to make our nation’s history relevant and real through interpretation, interaction, and education, strengthening Greater Philadelphia’s role as the destination to experience American History. To serve this mission HPI manages, programs, and maintains three properties including the Betsy Ross House, Franklin Square and Once Upon a Nation.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 42
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Great Plains Zoo

805 S. Kiwanis Ave., Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 57104, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

The Great Plains Zoo & Delbridge Museum of Natural History is a non-profit organization dedicated to fostering a greater understanding of our natural world through education, conservation, recreation and discovery. The Great Plains Zoo is an accredited member of the Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA) – a leader in wildlife conservation. Fewer than 10% of animal institutions in the United States have met the high standards for AZA accreditation. Open 361 days a year, the Great Plains Zoo & Delbridge Museum of Natural History is home to more than 1,000 animals from 137 species including 24 endangered species, and teaches 40,000 kids and families in unique, experience-based education programs each year. The 45-acre park offers up-close views to animals often not found in larger Zoos including Tigers, Rhinos, Bears, Primates, Giraffe, and an award-winning Snow Monkey exhibit. The Zoo also includes the Delbridge Museum of Natural History, a rare collection of 150 mounted animals including 38 “vanishing species.”

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 55
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historic-philadelphia-inc.jpeg
Historic Philadelphia, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/great-plains-zoo-and-delbridge-museum.jpeg
Great Plains Zoo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Historic Philadelphia, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Great Plains Zoo
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Historic Philadelphia, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Great Plains Zoo in 2025.

Incident History — Historic Philadelphia, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Historic Philadelphia, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Great Plains Zoo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Great Plains Zoo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historic-philadelphia-inc.jpeg
Historic Philadelphia, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/great-plains-zoo-and-delbridge-museum.jpeg
Great Plains Zoo
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Historic Philadelphia, Inc. company and Great Plains Zoo company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Great Plains Zoo company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Historic Philadelphia, Inc. company.

In the current year, Great Plains Zoo company and Historic Philadelphia, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Great Plains Zoo company nor Historic Philadelphia, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Great Plains Zoo company nor Historic Philadelphia, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Great Plains Zoo company nor Historic Philadelphia, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Historic Philadelphia, Inc. company nor Great Plains Zoo company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Historic Philadelphia, Inc. nor Great Plains Zoo holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Historic Philadelphia, Inc. company nor Great Plains Zoo company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Great Plains Zoo company employs more people globally than Historic Philadelphia, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Historic Philadelphia, Inc. nor Great Plains Zoo holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Historic Philadelphia, Inc. nor Great Plains Zoo holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Historic Philadelphia, Inc. nor Great Plains Zoo holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Historic Philadelphia, Inc. nor Great Plains Zoo holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Historic Philadelphia, Inc. nor Great Plains Zoo holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Historic Philadelphia, Inc. nor Great Plains Zoo holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X