Comparison Overview

Historic New England

VS

Rolling Hills Zoo

Historic New England

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23

Historic New England is the oldest and largest regional heritage organization in the nation. We engage diverse audiences in developing a deeper understanding and enjoyment of New England home life by being the national leader in collecting, preserving, and using significant buildings, landscapes, archives, stories, and objects from the past to today.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 236
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Rolling Hills Zoo

625 N. Hedville Road, Hedville (Near Salina), Kansas, 67401, US
Last Update: 2026-01-17

The Rolling Hills Zoo is a nationally recognized zoological park situated near Salina, Kansas. Our zoo is accredited with the Association of Zoos and Aquariums, The AZA is the independent accrediting organization for the best zoos and aquariums in America and the world, assuring the public that when they visit an AZA-accredited facility, it meets the highest standards. Less than 10 percent of the 2,800 wildlife exhibitors licensed by the United States Department of Agriculture under the Animal Welfare Act meet the more comprehensive standards of AZA accreditation. The Rolling Hills Zoo is an 501(c) registered non-profit that is dedicated to wildlife conservation and educating the next generation on the importance of bio-diversity on our planet. We engage in public science education, significant conservation and animal welfare projects, and deliver the very best in animal care and welfare for our animals, while providing engaging, meaningful family oriented experiences that last a lifetime. Many of our residents have been featured in National Geographic as part of the Joel Sartore’s "Photo Ark" project. One of National Geographic's covers was of our own waxy monkey tree frog. Photo Ark was a multiyear effort for Sartore to photograph captive species and inspire people to save these animals before they disappear. For many of Earth's creatures, time is running out. Species are disappearing at an alarming rate. To motivate people to care and help stop the crisis, Sartore is creating intimate portraits of an estimated 12,000 species of birds, fish, mammals, reptiles, amphibians and invertebrates.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historic-new-england.jpeg
Historic New England
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rollinghillszoo.jpeg
Rolling Hills Zoo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Historic New England
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rolling Hills Zoo
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Historic New England in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rolling Hills Zoo in 2026.

Incident History — Historic New England (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Historic New England cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rolling Hills Zoo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rolling Hills Zoo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historic-new-england.jpeg
Historic New England
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rollinghillszoo.jpeg
Rolling Hills Zoo
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Rolling Hills Zoo company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Historic New England company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Rolling Hills Zoo company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Historic New England company.

In the current year, Rolling Hills Zoo company and Historic New England company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rolling Hills Zoo company nor Historic New England company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Rolling Hills Zoo company nor Historic New England company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Rolling Hills Zoo company nor Historic New England company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Historic New England company nor Rolling Hills Zoo company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Historic New England nor Rolling Hills Zoo holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Historic New England company nor Rolling Hills Zoo company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Historic New England company employs more people globally than Rolling Hills Zoo company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Historic New England nor Rolling Hills Zoo holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Historic New England nor Rolling Hills Zoo holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Historic New England nor Rolling Hills Zoo holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Historic New England nor Rolling Hills Zoo holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Historic New England nor Rolling Hills Zoo holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Historic New England nor Rolling Hills Zoo holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H