Comparison Overview

Historic House Trust of New York City

VS

Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo

Historic House Trust of New York City

117-02 Roosevelt Avenue, Flushing, NY, 11368, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03

In partnership with NYC Parks, the Historic House Trust advocates for, promotes, and provides expertise to preserve 23 publicly owned historic sites located throughout New York City’s five boroughs. Located on public parkland, our 23 partner historic sites are open to all and are instrumental in creating engaging programs for their surrounding communities. Ranging from modest farms to grand mansions, these landmark sites provide essential windows into the lives of all New Yorkers, past and present. We are a team of historic preservation professionals that believe the structural integrity of historic buildings is the foundation of telling New York’s diverse stories. We believe historic sites are not static antiquities – they are living institutions uniquely poised to address current issues in their communities and the world while retaining their connections to the past.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo

1875 Noble Ave, Bridgeport, CT, 06610, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo is the state's only zoo - providing wild experiences for more than 100 years. Visit more than 350 species of primarily North and South American animals, including Amur tiger and leopards, Brazilian ocelot, Mexican wolves, and golden Lion tamarins. Highlights include our new Andean bear habitat, spider monkey habitat, Natt Family Red Panda Habitat, South American rainforest with free-flight aviary, the prairie dog exhibit with "pop-up"​ viewing areas, the New England Farmyard with goats, cows, pigs, and other barnyard favorites, plus the hoofstock trail featuring bison, deer, and more.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 58
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historic-house-trust-of-new-york-city.jpeg
Historic House Trust of New York City
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/connecticut's-beardsley-zoo.jpeg
Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Historic House Trust of New York City
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Historic House Trust of New York City in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo in 2025.

Incident History — Historic House Trust of New York City (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Historic House Trust of New York City cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historic-house-trust-of-new-york-city.jpeg
Historic House Trust of New York City
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/connecticut's-beardsley-zoo.jpeg
Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Historic House Trust of New York City company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Historic House Trust of New York City company.

In the current year, Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo company and Historic House Trust of New York City company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo company nor Historic House Trust of New York City company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo company nor Historic House Trust of New York City company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo company nor Historic House Trust of New York City company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Historic House Trust of New York City company nor Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Historic House Trust of New York City nor Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Historic House Trust of New York City company nor Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo company employs more people globally than Historic House Trust of New York City company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Historic House Trust of New York City nor Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Historic House Trust of New York City nor Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Historic House Trust of New York City nor Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Historic House Trust of New York City nor Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Historic House Trust of New York City nor Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Historic House Trust of New York City nor Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X