Comparison Overview

Historic Hope Plantation

VS

RCAHMS

Historic Hope Plantation

132 Hope House Ln, Windsor, North Carolina, 27983, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Restored home of former North Carolina Governor David Stone (1770-1818). Located four miles west of Windsor, NC, the plantation complex offers unique insights to the late 18th and 19th century rural life in Eastern North Carolina and the South. The centerpiece of the plantation is the c. 1803 Hope Mansion.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

RCAHMS

GB
Last Update: 2026-01-23

This page is now inactive. Please see www.linkedin.com/company/historic-environment-scotland RCAHMS merged with Historic Scotland in October 2015 to form Historic Environment Scotland. Historic Environment Scotland is the lead public body established to investigate, care for and promote Scotland’s historic environment. ************************************************************************************************************************ RCAHMS is the National Collection of materials on Scotland's built environment that connects people to places across time. RCAHMS holds over 15 million photographs, drawings, maps and manuscripts relating to Scotland's architecture, archaeology and industry. This varied material is made available to the public in exhibitions, publications and via the web, and can also be browsed in person at RCAHMS search room in Edinburgh. Our resources help people to value and enjoy their surroundings; they help in understanding the human influence on Scotland's places from earliest times to the present day; and they provide a world-class record of Scotland's unique historic and built environment to local, national and international audiences.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 20
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historic-hope-plantation.jpeg
Historic Hope Plantation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rcahms.jpeg
RCAHMS
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Historic Hope Plantation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
RCAHMS
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Historic Hope Plantation in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RCAHMS in 2026.

Incident History — Historic Hope Plantation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Historic Hope Plantation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — RCAHMS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RCAHMS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historic-hope-plantation.jpeg
Historic Hope Plantation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rcahms.jpeg
RCAHMS
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

RCAHMS company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Historic Hope Plantation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, RCAHMS company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Historic Hope Plantation company.

In the current year, RCAHMS company and Historic Hope Plantation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither RCAHMS company nor Historic Hope Plantation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither RCAHMS company nor Historic Hope Plantation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither RCAHMS company nor Historic Hope Plantation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Historic Hope Plantation company nor RCAHMS company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Historic Hope Plantation nor RCAHMS holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Historic Hope Plantation company nor RCAHMS company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

RCAHMS company employs more people globally than Historic Hope Plantation company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Historic Hope Plantation nor RCAHMS holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Historic Hope Plantation nor RCAHMS holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Historic Hope Plantation nor RCAHMS holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Historic Hope Plantation nor RCAHMS holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Historic Hope Plantation nor RCAHMS holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Historic Hope Plantation nor RCAHMS holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H