Comparison Overview

Historic Germantown

VS

Memphis Rock n Soul Museum/Memphis Music Hall of Fame Museum

Historic Germantown

None
Last Update: 2026-01-22

HISTORIC GERMANTOWN IS A PARTNERSHIP of sixteen historical houses, destinations and museums in Northwest Philadelphia that have come together to protect, preserve and share some of Philadelphia's most prized historical assets. Few places in America are home to so many significant historic resources in such a concentrated area. Historic Germantown is recognized as the nation's longest National Historic District that stretches along Germantown Avenue, formerly known as "The Great Road." Truly representative of the Philadelphia experience, HG member sites were situated on the front lines of our collective history, for example - an actual battleground of the revolution, an actual sanctuary from slavery - where everyday people risked their lives and livelihood in the name of freedom. The significance of these sites in American history is indisputable and, in many ways, unequalled. Through its innovative collaborative partnership, Historic Germantown provides a national model for how nonprofits should collaborate to share and leverage resources.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Memphis Rock n Soul Museum/Memphis Music Hall of Fame Museum

191 Beale St, Memphis, Tennessee, 38103, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21

The Memphis Rock ‘n’ Soul Museum’s exhibition about the birth of rock and soul music is based on one created by the Smithsonian Institution in 2000. It tells the story of musical pioneers who, for the love of music, overcame racial and socio-economic barriers to create the music that shook the entire world. Located at 191 Beale, on the corner of legendary Highway 61 and inside of the FedExForum sports and entertainment complex, the museum offers a comprehensive Memphis music experience. It will take you from the rural field hollers and sharecroppers of the 1930s, through the explosion of Sun, Stax, and Hi Records, inside Memphis’ musical heyday in the 70s, to its global musical influence. The museum’s digital audio tour guide is packed with over 300 minutes of information, including over 100 songs. It takes visitors at their own pace through seven galleries featuring 3 audio visual programs, more than 30 instruments, 40 costumes, and other musical treasures.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historic-germantown.jpeg
Historic Germantown
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/memphis-rock-n-soul-museum.jpeg
Memphis Rock n Soul Museum/Memphis Music Hall of Fame Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Historic Germantown
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Memphis Rock n Soul Museum/Memphis Music Hall of Fame Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Historic Germantown in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Memphis Rock n Soul Museum/Memphis Music Hall of Fame Museum in 2026.

Incident History — Historic Germantown (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Historic Germantown cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Memphis Rock n Soul Museum/Memphis Music Hall of Fame Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Memphis Rock n Soul Museum/Memphis Music Hall of Fame Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historic-germantown.jpeg
Historic Germantown
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/memphis-rock-n-soul-museum.jpeg
Memphis Rock n Soul Museum/Memphis Music Hall of Fame Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Historic Germantown company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Memphis Rock n Soul Museum/Memphis Music Hall of Fame Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Memphis Rock n Soul Museum/Memphis Music Hall of Fame Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Historic Germantown company.

In the current year, Memphis Rock n Soul Museum/Memphis Music Hall of Fame Museum company and Historic Germantown company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Memphis Rock n Soul Museum/Memphis Music Hall of Fame Museum company nor Historic Germantown company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Memphis Rock n Soul Museum/Memphis Music Hall of Fame Museum company nor Historic Germantown company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Memphis Rock n Soul Museum/Memphis Music Hall of Fame Museum company nor Historic Germantown company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Historic Germantown company nor Memphis Rock n Soul Museum/Memphis Music Hall of Fame Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Historic Germantown nor Memphis Rock n Soul Museum/Memphis Music Hall of Fame Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Historic Germantown company nor Memphis Rock n Soul Museum/Memphis Music Hall of Fame Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Historic Germantown company employs more people globally than Memphis Rock n Soul Museum/Memphis Music Hall of Fame Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Historic Germantown nor Memphis Rock n Soul Museum/Memphis Music Hall of Fame Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Historic Germantown nor Memphis Rock n Soul Museum/Memphis Music Hall of Fame Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Historic Germantown nor Memphis Rock n Soul Museum/Memphis Music Hall of Fame Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Historic Germantown nor Memphis Rock n Soul Museum/Memphis Music Hall of Fame Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Historic Germantown nor Memphis Rock n Soul Museum/Memphis Music Hall of Fame Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Historic Germantown nor Memphis Rock n Soul Museum/Memphis Music Hall of Fame Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N