Comparison Overview

Historic Denver

VS

The Royal Institution

Historic Denver

undefined, undefined, undefined, 80202, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.historicdenver.org

Historic Denver, Inc. is one of the nation’s premier urban historic preservation organizations. Preserving Denver’s distinctive cultural and architectural heritage is our work and passion. Our responsibility as a nonprofit corporation is to be a catalyst for and advocate of ideas, programs, actions and plans which enable our community to respect and carry forward the preservation of this heritage. Our success is achieved with advocacy, technical services, educational programs, membership events, and through the direct stewardship of historic resources through our grant management program and through our flagship property, the Molly Brown House Museum.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

The Royal Institution

21 Albemarle Street, London, undefined, W1S 4BS, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://www.rigb.org

The Royal Institution is an independent charity dedicated to connecting people with the world of science. Science shapes our lives, our culture and the world around us. It’s the medical treatment that may save your life. It’s the device in your pocket that connects you to the world. And it’s how we will solve the major global challenges of the future. Our mission is to harness science for the maximum benefit of society. The importance of our mission cannot be overstated. It was recognised by the 58 wealthy individuals who founded the Ri in 1799 and is just as relevant today. But to achieve the full benefits of what science has to offer, we must ensure that there is a healthy interaction between science and society – something we have pioneered for more than 200 years. There are multiple ways to get involved and support the Ri and to think more deeply about the wonders and applications of science. The Royal Institution is a registered charity, no 227938.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 177
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historic-denver-inc..jpeg
Historic Denver
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-royal-institution-of-great-britain.jpeg
The Royal Institution
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Historic Denver
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Royal Institution
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Historic Denver in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Royal Institution in 2026.

Incident History — Historic Denver (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Historic Denver cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Royal Institution (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Royal Institution cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historic-denver-inc..jpeg
Historic Denver
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-royal-institution-of-great-britain.jpeg
The Royal Institution
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Royal Institution company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Historic Denver company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Royal Institution company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Historic Denver company.

In the current year, The Royal Institution company and Historic Denver company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Royal Institution company nor Historic Denver company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Royal Institution company nor Historic Denver company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Royal Institution company nor Historic Denver company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Historic Denver company nor The Royal Institution company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Historic Denver nor The Royal Institution holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Historic Denver company nor The Royal Institution company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Royal Institution company employs more people globally than Historic Denver company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Historic Denver nor The Royal Institution holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Historic Denver nor The Royal Institution holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Historic Denver nor The Royal Institution holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Historic Denver nor The Royal Institution holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Historic Denver nor The Royal Institution holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Historic Denver nor The Royal Institution holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References