Comparison Overview

Historic Denver

VS

Institute of Contemporary Art, Los Angeles (ICA LA)

Historic Denver

undefined, undefined, undefined, 80202, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18

Historic Denver, Inc. is one of the nation’s premier urban historic preservation organizations. Preserving Denver’s distinctive cultural and architectural heritage is our work and passion. Our responsibility as a nonprofit corporation is to be a catalyst for and advocate of ideas, programs, actions and plans which enable our community to respect and carry forward the preservation of this heritage. Our success is achieved with advocacy, technical services, educational programs, membership events, and through the direct stewardship of historic resources through our grant management program and through our flagship property, the Molly Brown House Museum.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Institute of Contemporary Art, Los Angeles (ICA LA)

1717 E. 7th Street, Los Angeles, 90021, US
Last Update: 2026-01-13
Between 750 and 799

Institute of Contemporary Art, Los Angeles (ICA LA)’s mission is to support art that sparks the pleasure of discovery and challenges the way we see and experience the world, ourselves, and each other. ICA LA is committed to upending hierarchies of race, class, gender, and culture. Through exhibitions, education programs, and community partnerships, ICA LA fosters critique of the familiar and empathy with the different. ICA LA is committed to making contemporary art relevant and accessible for all. Admission is free.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historic-denver-inc..jpeg
Historic Denver
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-institute-of-contemporary-art-los-angeles-ica-la-.jpeg
Institute of Contemporary Art, Los Angeles (ICA LA)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Historic Denver
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Institute of Contemporary Art, Los Angeles (ICA LA)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Historic Denver in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Institute of Contemporary Art, Los Angeles (ICA LA) in 2026.

Incident History — Historic Denver (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Historic Denver cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Institute of Contemporary Art, Los Angeles (ICA LA) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Institute of Contemporary Art, Los Angeles (ICA LA) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historic-denver-inc..jpeg
Historic Denver
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-institute-of-contemporary-art-los-angeles-ica-la-.jpeg
Institute of Contemporary Art, Los Angeles (ICA LA)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Historic Denver company and Institute of Contemporary Art, Los Angeles (ICA LA) company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Institute of Contemporary Art, Los Angeles (ICA LA) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Historic Denver company.

In the current year, Institute of Contemporary Art, Los Angeles (ICA LA) company and Historic Denver company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Institute of Contemporary Art, Los Angeles (ICA LA) company nor Historic Denver company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Institute of Contemporary Art, Los Angeles (ICA LA) company nor Historic Denver company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Institute of Contemporary Art, Los Angeles (ICA LA) company nor Historic Denver company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Historic Denver company nor Institute of Contemporary Art, Los Angeles (ICA LA) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Historic Denver nor Institute of Contemporary Art, Los Angeles (ICA LA) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Historic Denver company nor Institute of Contemporary Art, Los Angeles (ICA LA) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Institute of Contemporary Art, Los Angeles (ICA LA) company employs more people globally than Historic Denver company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Historic Denver nor Institute of Contemporary Art, Los Angeles (ICA LA) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Historic Denver nor Institute of Contemporary Art, Los Angeles (ICA LA) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Historic Denver nor Institute of Contemporary Art, Los Angeles (ICA LA) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Historic Denver nor Institute of Contemporary Art, Los Angeles (ICA LA) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Historic Denver nor Institute of Contemporary Art, Los Angeles (ICA LA) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Historic Denver nor Institute of Contemporary Art, Los Angeles (ICA LA) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H