Comparison Overview

Historic Deerfield

VS

Orange County Regional History Center

Historic Deerfield

84 OLD MAIN ST, None, Deerfield, Massachusetts, US, 01342
Last Update: 2026-01-18
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.historic-deerfield.org

Historic Deerfield is a museum of early American life situated in an authentic 18th-century New England village in the Connecticut River Valley of Massachusetts. Its historic houses and world-famous collection of early American decorative arts open doors to new perspectives that inspire people to seek a deeper understanding of themselves, their communities, and the world.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 72
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Orange County Regional History Center

65 E. Central Blvd., Orlando, Florida, 32801, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://thehistorycenter.org/

Mission: To serve as a gateway for community engagement, education, and inspiration by preserving and sharing Central Florida's continually unfolding story. The Orange County Regional History Center, a Smithsonian Institution affiliate and American Alliance of Museums member, is one of the state’s preeminent cultural institutions. The History Center includes a history museum in a renovated 1927 courthouse, the collection of the Historical Society of Central Florida, the Joseph L. Brechner Research Library, the Emporium Museum Store, and Heritage Square park. The museum has advanced its global mission to honor the past, explore the present, and shape the future through wide-ranging programs, permanent and traveling exhibits, and limited-run exhibitions from other prestigious institutions.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 45
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historic-deerfield.jpeg
Historic Deerfield
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/orange-county-regional-history-center.jpeg
Orange County Regional History Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Historic Deerfield
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Orange County Regional History Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Historic Deerfield in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Orange County Regional History Center in 2026.

Incident History — Historic Deerfield (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Historic Deerfield cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Orange County Regional History Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Orange County Regional History Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historic-deerfield.jpeg
Historic Deerfield
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/orange-county-regional-history-center.jpeg
Orange County Regional History Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Historic Deerfield company and Orange County Regional History Center company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Orange County Regional History Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Historic Deerfield company.

In the current year, Orange County Regional History Center company and Historic Deerfield company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Orange County Regional History Center company nor Historic Deerfield company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Orange County Regional History Center company nor Historic Deerfield company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Orange County Regional History Center company nor Historic Deerfield company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Historic Deerfield company nor Orange County Regional History Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Historic Deerfield nor Orange County Regional History Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Historic Deerfield company nor Orange County Regional History Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Historic Deerfield company employs more people globally than Orange County Regional History Center company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Historic Deerfield nor Orange County Regional History Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Historic Deerfield nor Orange County Regional History Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Historic Deerfield nor Orange County Regional History Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Historic Deerfield nor Orange County Regional History Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Historic Deerfield nor Orange County Regional History Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Historic Deerfield nor Orange County Regional History Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References