Comparison Overview

Historic Deerfield

VS

Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture)

Historic Deerfield

84 OLD MAIN ST, None, Deerfield, Massachusetts, US, 01342
Last Update: 2026-01-18
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.historic-deerfield.org

Historic Deerfield is a museum of early American life situated in an authentic 18th-century New England village in the Connecticut River Valley of Massachusetts. Its historic houses and world-famous collection of early American decorative arts open doors to new perspectives that inspire people to seek a deeper understanding of themselves, their communities, and the world.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 72
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture)

1048 Washington Street, Cape May, NJ, 08204, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.capemaymac.org

Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) is a multi-faceted non-profit organization that promotes the restoration, interpretation and cultural enrichment of greater Cape May for its residents and visitors. With a membership of more than 3,200, a paid staff of 160 and some 300 volunteers, Cape May MAC offers a year-round calendar of tours and special events that serves more than 300,000 people each year. Through its sponsorship of cultural and heritage tourism, Cape May MAC has helped transform Cape May from a "summer only"​ beach resort to the country's leading Victorian theme destination. Cape May MAC was formed in September, 1970 by a small group of Cape May citizens with the express purpose of rescuing the 1879 Emlen Physick Estate, an 18 room mansion, from demolition. Their campaign to preserve not only the Physick Estate but Victorian architectural treasures throughout Cape May has played a vital role in revitalizing the nation's oldest seaside resort

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 39
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historic-deerfield.jpeg
Historic Deerfield
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mid-atlantic-center-for-the-arts-&-humanities.jpeg
Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture)
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Historic Deerfield
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Historic Deerfield in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) in 2026.

Incident History — Historic Deerfield (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Historic Deerfield cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historic-deerfield.jpeg
Historic Deerfield
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mid-atlantic-center-for-the-arts-&-humanities.jpeg
Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Historic Deerfield company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Historic Deerfield company.

In the current year, Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) company and Historic Deerfield company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) company nor Historic Deerfield company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) company nor Historic Deerfield company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) company nor Historic Deerfield company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Historic Deerfield company nor Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Historic Deerfield nor Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Historic Deerfield company nor Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Historic Deerfield company employs more people globally than Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Historic Deerfield nor Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Historic Deerfield nor Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Historic Deerfield nor Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Historic Deerfield nor Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Historic Deerfield nor Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Historic Deerfield nor Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References