Comparison Overview

Historic Deerfield

VS

Descanso Gardens

Historic Deerfield

84 OLD MAIN ST, None, Deerfield, Massachusetts, US, 01342
Last Update: 2026-01-18
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.historic-deerfield.org

Historic Deerfield is a museum of early American life situated in an authentic 18th-century New England village in the Connecticut River Valley of Massachusetts. Its historic houses and world-famous collection of early American decorative arts open doors to new perspectives that inspire people to seek a deeper understanding of themselves, their communities, and the world.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 72
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Descanso Gardens

1418 Descanso Drive, La Canada Flintridge, California, 91011, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://www.descansogardens.org

Descanso Gardens is an urban retreat of year-round natural beauty, internationally renowned botanical collections and spectacular seasonal horticultural displays. Founded in 1953, Descanso Gardens is operated and funded by the nonprofit Descanso Gardens Foundation, in a public-private partnership with the County of Los Angeles. An accredited museum of living collections by the American Association of Museums, Descanso Gardens welcomes over 950,000 visitors annually from Southern California and beyond.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 55
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historic-deerfield.jpeg
Historic Deerfield
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/descanso-gardens-guild-inc-.jpeg
Descanso Gardens
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Historic Deerfield
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Descanso Gardens
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Historic Deerfield in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Descanso Gardens in 2026.

Incident History — Historic Deerfield (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Historic Deerfield cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Descanso Gardens (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Descanso Gardens cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historic-deerfield.jpeg
Historic Deerfield
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/descanso-gardens-guild-inc-.jpeg
Descanso Gardens
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Historic Deerfield company and Descanso Gardens company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Descanso Gardens company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Historic Deerfield company.

In the current year, Descanso Gardens company and Historic Deerfield company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Descanso Gardens company nor Historic Deerfield company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Descanso Gardens company nor Historic Deerfield company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Descanso Gardens company nor Historic Deerfield company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Historic Deerfield company nor Descanso Gardens company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Historic Deerfield nor Descanso Gardens holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Historic Deerfield company nor Descanso Gardens company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Historic Deerfield company employs more people globally than Descanso Gardens company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Historic Deerfield nor Descanso Gardens holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Historic Deerfield nor Descanso Gardens holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Historic Deerfield nor Descanso Gardens holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Historic Deerfield nor Descanso Gardens holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Historic Deerfield nor Descanso Gardens holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Historic Deerfield nor Descanso Gardens holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References