Comparison Overview

Historic Deerfield

VS

Children's Museum of South Dakota

Historic Deerfield

84 OLD MAIN ST, None, Deerfield, Massachusetts, US, 01342
Last Update: 2025-12-02
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.historic-deerfield.org

Historic Deerfield is a museum of early American life situated in an authentic 18th-century New England village in the Connecticut River Valley of Massachusetts. Its historic houses and world-famous collection of early American decorative arts open doors to new perspectives that inspire people to seek a deeper understanding of themselves, their communities, and the world.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 72
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Children's Museum of South Dakota

521 4th Street, Brookings, South Dakota, 57006, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799
http://prairieplay.org

The Children's Museum of South Dakota seeks to transform the world by inspiring generations to love learning and believe that life is full of possibilities. We spark imagination for all children and their grown-ups through play, creativity, and discovery. With more than 44,000 square feet of indoor play space on 4 acres of prairie, we tell the story of our connection between land and culture in the Midwest region. Guests are encouraged to use their imagination and explore using more than 5,000 lose parts and props, but we may be most famous for housing the country's largest animatronic dinosaur, Mama T. Rex.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historic-deerfield.jpeg
Historic Deerfield
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/children's-museum-of-south-dakota.jpeg
Children's Museum of South Dakota
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Historic Deerfield
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Children's Museum of South Dakota
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Historic Deerfield in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Children's Museum of South Dakota in 2025.

Incident History — Historic Deerfield (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Historic Deerfield cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Children's Museum of South Dakota (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Children's Museum of South Dakota cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historic-deerfield.jpeg
Historic Deerfield
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/children's-museum-of-south-dakota.jpeg
Children's Museum of South Dakota
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Historic Deerfield company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Children's Museum of South Dakota company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Children's Museum of South Dakota company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Historic Deerfield company.

In the current year, Children's Museum of South Dakota company and Historic Deerfield company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Children's Museum of South Dakota company nor Historic Deerfield company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Children's Museum of South Dakota company nor Historic Deerfield company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Children's Museum of South Dakota company nor Historic Deerfield company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Historic Deerfield company nor Children's Museum of South Dakota company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Historic Deerfield nor Children's Museum of South Dakota holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Historic Deerfield company nor Children's Museum of South Dakota company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Historic Deerfield company employs more people globally than Children's Museum of South Dakota company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Historic Deerfield nor Children's Museum of South Dakota holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Historic Deerfield nor Children's Museum of South Dakota holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Historic Deerfield nor Children's Museum of South Dakota holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Historic Deerfield nor Children's Museum of South Dakota holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Historic Deerfield nor Children's Museum of South Dakota holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Historic Deerfield nor Children's Museum of South Dakota holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References