Comparison Overview

Hino Saudi Arabia

VS

Saud Bahwan Group LLC

Hino Saudi Arabia

P. O. Box 1247, Jeddah, undefined, 21431, SA
Last Update: 2025-03-15 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

Hino is a TOYOTA group company and the largest manufacturer of heavy and medium-duty trucks in Japan; Hino also manufactures a growing number of light-duty trucks. Hino has a large market share in Asian countries. Hino global operations also serve a growing range of customer in North America & in other regions. In 1972, Toyota Tsusho began exporting Hino trucks to Saudi Arabia, partnering with the Jamjoom Vehicles & Equipment โ€œJVEโ€ as a local Hino distributor. The newly established company combines the Jamjoomโ€™ s well-known customer trusted brand with Toyota Tsushoโ€™s after-sales service know-how developed through its global automobile business. After all these years, JVE has witnessed great challenges and expansion that decided new aspirations and great ambition, especially as KSA is going through a major transformation by pursuing Vision 2030 as its economic and social reform strategy to reduce dependence on oil production and diversify the industry. Amid this reform, local truck demand continues to expand, and currently, Saudi Arabia accounts for 50% of the commercial vehicle market in the Middle East. Going forward, sustained expansion of the demand for trucks is expected due to the role they play in the logistics infrastructure supporting new industry born from industrial diversification and the increase in construction investment. Finally, Toyota Tsusho Corporation (โ€œToyota Tsushoโ€) has established a Saudi Arabian wholesale and retailing company for Hino Motors, Ltd. (โ€œHinoโ€) trucks in partnership with local conglomerate Jamjoom Group. Tsusho Jamjoom Trading Company (โ€ TJTโ€), began business activities in October 2019 as the first-ever Japanese-owned truck wholesales and retailer in Saudi Arabia.

NAICS: 336
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Saud Bahwan Group LLC

PO Box 3168, Ruwi, Postal Code 112, Sultanate of Oman. Muscat, Muscat 112, OO
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Strong

Building Brands. Building Enduring Success. As one of the nationโ€™s largest corporate houses, Saud Bahwan Group is at the forefront of touching peopleโ€™s lives through a range of market leaders across diverse businesses. They include brands like Toyota, Lexus, Hino, Yokohama, Komatsu, Kato, Hertz and more. The Group has strong presence in fields as diverse as Automobiles & Allied Businesses, Heavy Vehicles, Construction Equipment, Turnkey Projects, Oil & Gas, Special Equipment, Municipal and Civic Services, Real Estate, and Travel & Tourism. In pushing outwards the boundaries the excellence, the group has always maintained the highest levels of customer satisfaction. Today, Saud Bahwan Group serves customers with a nationwide network of branches, well-appointed showrooms, state-of-the-art parts & service operations backed by sophisticated warehousing facilities. The Group has won many accolades from across the world for continuously setting new benchmarks in customer service. Show more Show less

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hino-trucks-saudi-arabia.jpeg
Hino Saudi Arabia
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/saud-bahwan-group-llc.jpeg
Saud Bahwan Group LLC
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Hino Saudi Arabia
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Saud Bahwan Group LLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hino Saudi Arabia in 2025.

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Saud Bahwan Group LLC in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Hino Saudi Arabia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hino Saudi Arabia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Saud Bahwan Group LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Saud Bahwan Group LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hino-trucks-saudi-arabia.jpeg
Hino Saudi Arabia
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/saud-bahwan-group-llc.jpeg
Saud Bahwan Group LLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Hino Saudi Arabia company company demonstrates a stronger AI risk posture compared to Saud Bahwan Group LLC company company, reflecting its advanced AI governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Saud Bahwan Group LLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hino Saudi Arabia company.

In the current year, Saud Bahwan Group LLC company and Hino Saudi Arabia company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Saud Bahwan Group LLC company nor Hino Saudi Arabia company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Saud Bahwan Group LLC company nor Hino Saudi Arabia company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Saud Bahwan Group LLC company nor Hino Saudi Arabia company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hino Saudi Arabia company nor Saud Bahwan Group LLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hino Saudi Arabia company nor Saud Bahwan Group LLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Hino Saudi Arabia company employs more people globally than Saud Bahwan Group LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Motor Vehicle Manufacturing.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was found in LaChatterie Verger up to 1.2.10. This impacts the function redirectToAuthorization of the file /src/main/services/mcp/oauth/provider.ts. The manipulation of the argument URL results in deserialization. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability has been found in SeriaWei ZKEACMS up to 4.3. This affects the function Delete of the file src/ZKEACMS.Redirection/Controllers/UrlRedirectionController.cs of the component POST Request Handler. The manipulation leads to improper authorization. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: jfs: fix invalid free of JFS_IP(ipimap)->i_imap in diUnmount syzbot found an invalid-free in diUnmount: BUG: KASAN: double-free in slab_free mm/slub.c:3661 [inline] BUG: KASAN: double-free in __kmem_cache_free+0x71/0x110 mm/slub.c:3674 Free of addr ffff88806f410000 by task syz-executor131/3632 CPU: 0 PID: 3632 Comm: syz-executor131 Not tainted 6.1.0-rc7-syzkaller-00012-gca57f02295f1 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/26/2022 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x1b1/0x28e lib/dump_stack.c:106 print_address_description+0x74/0x340 mm/kasan/report.c:284 print_report+0x107/0x1f0 mm/kasan/report.c:395 kasan_report_invalid_free+0xac/0xd0 mm/kasan/report.c:460 ____kasan_slab_free+0xfb/0x120 kasan_slab_free include/linux/kasan.h:177 [inline] slab_free_hook mm/slub.c:1724 [inline] slab_free_freelist_hook+0x12e/0x1a0 mm/slub.c:1750 slab_free mm/slub.c:3661 [inline] __kmem_cache_free+0x71/0x110 mm/slub.c:3674 diUnmount+0xef/0x100 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:195 jfs_umount+0x108/0x370 fs/jfs/jfs_umount.c:63 jfs_put_super+0x86/0x190 fs/jfs/super.c:194 generic_shutdown_super+0x130/0x310 fs/super.c:492 kill_block_super+0x79/0xd0 fs/super.c:1428 deactivate_locked_super+0xa7/0xf0 fs/super.c:332 cleanup_mnt+0x494/0x520 fs/namespace.c:1186 task_work_run+0x243/0x300 kernel/task_work.c:179 exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:38 [inline] do_exit+0x664/0x2070 kernel/exit.c:820 do_group_exit+0x1fd/0x2b0 kernel/exit.c:950 __do_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:961 [inline] __se_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:959 [inline] __x64_sys_exit_group+0x3b/0x40 kernel/exit.c:959 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd [...] JFS_IP(ipimap)->i_imap is not setting to NULL after free in diUnmount. If jfs_remount() free JFS_IP(ipimap)->i_imap but then failed at diMount(). JFS_IP(ipimap)->i_imap will be freed once again. Fix this problem by setting JFS_IP(ipimap)->i_imap to NULL after free.

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: qla2xxx: Fix deletion race condition System crash when using debug kernel due to link list corruption. The cause of the link list corruption is due to session deletion was allowed to queue up twice. Here's the internal trace that show the same port was allowed to double queue for deletion on different cpu. 20808683956 015 qla2xxx [0000:13:00.1]-e801:4: Scheduling sess ffff93ebf9306800 for deletion 50:06:0e:80:12:48:ff:50 fc4_type 1 20808683957 027 qla2xxx [0000:13:00.1]-e801:4: Scheduling sess ffff93ebf9306800 for deletion 50:06:0e:80:12:48:ff:50 fc4_type 1 Move the clearing/setting of deleted flag lock.

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/ksm: fix race with VMA iteration and mm_struct teardown exit_mmap() will tear down the VMAs and maple tree with the mmap_lock held in write mode. Ensure that the maple tree is still valid by checking ksm_test_exit() after taking the mmap_lock in read mode, but before the for_each_vma() iterator dereferences a destroyed maple tree. Since the maple tree is destroyed, the flags telling lockdep to check an external lock has been cleared. Skip the for_each_vma() iterator to avoid dereferencing a maple tree without the external lock flag, which would create a lockdep warning.