Comparison Overview

HGS

VS

Infosys

HGS

HGS USA Corporate Headquarters , Chicago, IL , US
Last Update: 2025-12-08
Between 700 and 749

A global leader in optimizing the customer experience lifecycle, digital transformation, and business process management, HGS is helping its clients become more competitive every day. HGS combines automation, analytics, and artificial intelligence with deep domain expertise focusing on digital customer experiences, back-office processing, contact centers, and HRO solutions. Part of the multi-billion-dollar conglomerate Hinduja Group, HGS takes a “globally local” approach with over 18,000+ employees across 38 delivery centers in 9 countries.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 28,371
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Infosys

Infosys Limited, None, Bangalore, Karnataka, IN, 560100
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 700 and 749

Infosys is a global leader in next-generation digital services and consulting. We enable clients in more than 50 countries to navigate their digital transformation. With over three decades of experience in managing the systems and workings of global enterprises, we expertly steer our clients through their digital journey. We do it by enabling the enterprise with an AI-powered core that helps prioritize the execution of change. We also empower the business with agile digital at scale to deliver unprecedented levels of performance and customer delight. Our always-on learning agenda drives their continuous improvement through building and transferring digital skills, expertise, and ideas from our innovation ecosystem. Visit www.infosys.com to see how Infosys (NYSE: INFY) can help your enterprise navigate your next.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 352,623
Subsidiaries: 33
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hinduja-global-solutions-inc--.jpeg
HGS
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/infosys.jpeg
Infosys
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
HGS
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Infosys
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HGS in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

Infosys has 78.57% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — HGS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HGS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Infosys (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Infosys cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hinduja-global-solutions-inc--.jpeg
HGS
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/infosys.jpeg
Infosys
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access, Data Exfiltration
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

HGS company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Infosys company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Infosys company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas HGS company has not reported any.

In the current year, Infosys company has reported more cyber incidents than HGS company.

Neither Infosys company nor HGS company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Infosys company has disclosed at least one data breach, while HGS company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Infosys company nor HGS company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither HGS company nor Infosys company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither HGS nor Infosys holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Infosys company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to HGS company.

Infosys company employs more people globally than HGS company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither HGS nor Infosys holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither HGS nor Infosys holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither HGS nor Infosys holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither HGS nor Infosys holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither HGS nor Infosys holds HIPAA certification.

Neither HGS nor Infosys holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

WeGIA is an open source Web Manager for Institutions with a focus on Portuguese language users. Versions 3.5.4 and below contain a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the /WeGIA/html/geral/configurar_senhas.php endpoint. The application does not sanitize user-controlled data before rendering it inside the employee selection dropdown. The application retrieves employee names from the database and injects them directly into HTML <option> elements without proper escaping. This issue is fixed in version 3.5.5.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

ZITADEL is an open-source identity infrastructure tool. Versions 4.0.0-rc.1 through 4.7.0 are vulnerable to DOM-Based XSS through the Zitadel V2 logout endpoint. The /logout endpoint insecurely routes to a value that is supplied in the post_logout_redirect GET parameter. As a result, unauthenticated remote attacker can execute malicious JS code on Zitadel users’ browsers. To carry out an attack, multiple user sessions need to be active in the same browser, however, account takeover is mitigated when using Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) or Passwordless authentication. This issue is fixed in version 4.7.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

ZITADEL is an open-source identity infrastructure tool. Versions 4.7.0 and below are vulnerable to an unauthenticated, full-read SSRF vulnerability. The ZITADEL Login UI (V2) treats the x-zitadel-forward-host header as a trusted fallback for all deployments, including self-hosted instances. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to force the server to make HTTP requests to arbitrary domains, such as internal addresses, and read the responses, enabling data exfiltration and bypassing network-segmentation controls. This issue is fixed in version 4.7.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

NiceGUI is a Python-based UI framework. Versions 3.3.1 and below are vulnerable to directory traversal through the App.add_media_files() function, which allows a remote attacker to read arbitrary files on the server filesystem. This issue is fixed in version 3.4.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions are vulnerable to authentication bypass when the authentication type is set to "webserver." When providing an Authorization header with an arbitrary value, a session is associated with the target user regardless of valid credentials. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.44 and 17.0.23.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X