Comparison Overview

Hinds Behavioral Health Services

VS

Arbor Counseling Center

Hinds Behavioral Health Services

3450 Highway 80 West, None, Jackson, Mississippi, US, 39209
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Since 1971 Hinds Behavioral Health Services (HBHS) has specialized in community mental health services for adults, children and youth, families, elderly, and those with chemical dependencies and substance use disorders. Our mission is to provide quality, effective mental health services to the citizens of Hinds County. Access and care options can be found at www.hbhs9.com or by calling 601-321-2400. For Mobile Crisis Team services (emergency help after regular business hours, nights, holidays and weekends), call 601-955-6381.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 132
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Arbor Counseling Center

1401 McHenry Road Ste.122, Buffalo Grove, IL, 60089, US
Last Update:

Established in 1988, Arbor Counseling Center is a comprehensive psychotherapy practice that provides the highest quality counseling and consultation services to: Children, Adolescents, Adults, Couples, Families, Community Organizations, Businesses and Schools. We serve clients in the Northwest suburbs of Chicago including Lake, McHenry and Cook Counties. With 31 licensed therapists on staff and four offices in Hoffman Estates, Crystal Lake, Buffalo Grove and Gurnee, we can be more responsive to the needs of case managers, employee assistance programs, human resource professionals and referring organizations within the community. We believe in our clients — their strengths, resiliencies and their right to live life at their highest potential. Given empathy, support, encouragement and education tailored to each client's needs, our staff of caring, trained professionals helps each individual access their strengths. Our collaborative approach to solving problems helps children, adolescents, adults, couples, families and groups in living at the highest level of health, fulfillment and positive energy. Below are some of the services we provide.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 34
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hinds-behavioral-health-services.jpeg
Hinds Behavioral Health Services
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arbor-counseling-center.jpeg
Arbor Counseling Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hinds Behavioral Health Services
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Arbor Counseling Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hinds Behavioral Health Services in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Arbor Counseling Center in 2026.

Incident History — Hinds Behavioral Health Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hinds Behavioral Health Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Arbor Counseling Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Arbor Counseling Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hinds-behavioral-health-services.jpeg
Hinds Behavioral Health Services
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arbor-counseling-center.jpeg
Arbor Counseling Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Hinds Behavioral Health Services company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Arbor Counseling Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Arbor Counseling Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hinds Behavioral Health Services company.

In the current year, Arbor Counseling Center company and Hinds Behavioral Health Services company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Arbor Counseling Center company nor Hinds Behavioral Health Services company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Arbor Counseling Center company nor Hinds Behavioral Health Services company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Arbor Counseling Center company nor Hinds Behavioral Health Services company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hinds Behavioral Health Services company nor Arbor Counseling Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hinds Behavioral Health Services nor Arbor Counseling Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Arbor Counseling Center company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Hinds Behavioral Health Services company.

Hinds Behavioral Health Services company employs more people globally than Arbor Counseling Center company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Hinds Behavioral Health Services nor Arbor Counseling Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hinds Behavioral Health Services nor Arbor Counseling Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hinds Behavioral Health Services nor Arbor Counseling Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hinds Behavioral Health Services nor Arbor Counseling Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hinds Behavioral Health Services nor Arbor Counseling Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hinds Behavioral Health Services nor Arbor Counseling Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N