Comparison Overview

Hilton Investigations

VS

The Clark Law Firm, PC

Hilton Investigations

None
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Hilton Investigations has extensive experience in providing due diligence and litigation support to both Plaintiff and Defense Attorneys in complex civil matters, and can be an effective utility at any stage of the legal process. We often assist our attorney clients with liability assessments, case evaluations, and new client intake procedures.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Clark Law Firm, PC

1563 Main Street, Peckville, Pennsylvania, 18452, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Attorney Douglas Clark of The Clark Law Firm, PC provides representaion to landowners in negotiating all contracts comprised within the development of the Marcellus Shale. Doug also hosts a weekly radio show, "All Things Marcellus" with Attorney Douglas Clark; airing on GEM 104 and KZFM 96.9 and in Tioga County on The BUZZ 104.5 & 92.3FM and WNBT 1490 AM on Sunday mornings from 8am to 9am and archived on our websites at www.pagasleseattorney.com and www.pipelineattorney.com. Doug strongly believes that the key to successful negotiation is in educating the landowner. He has represented hundreds of property owners who own land in Pennsylvania.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hilton-investigations.jpeg
Hilton Investigations
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-clark-law-firm-pc.jpeg
The Clark Law Firm, PC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hilton Investigations
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Clark Law Firm, PC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hilton Investigations in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Clark Law Firm, PC in 2025.

Incident History — Hilton Investigations (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hilton Investigations cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Clark Law Firm, PC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Clark Law Firm, PC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hilton-investigations.jpeg
Hilton Investigations
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-clark-law-firm-pc.jpeg
The Clark Law Firm, PC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Hilton Investigations company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Clark Law Firm, PC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Clark Law Firm, PC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hilton Investigations company.

In the current year, The Clark Law Firm, PC company and Hilton Investigations company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Clark Law Firm, PC company nor Hilton Investigations company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Clark Law Firm, PC company nor Hilton Investigations company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Clark Law Firm, PC company nor Hilton Investigations company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hilton Investigations company nor The Clark Law Firm, PC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hilton Investigations nor The Clark Law Firm, PC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Hilton Investigations company nor The Clark Law Firm, PC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Clark Law Firm, PC company employs more people globally than Hilton Investigations company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Hilton Investigations nor The Clark Law Firm, PC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hilton Investigations nor The Clark Law Firm, PC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hilton Investigations nor The Clark Law Firm, PC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hilton Investigations nor The Clark Law Firm, PC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hilton Investigations nor The Clark Law Firm, PC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hilton Investigations nor The Clark Law Firm, PC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X