Comparison Overview

Hilton Hotels & Resorts

VS

Holiday Inn Express

Hilton Hotels & Resorts

7930 Jones Branch Drive, McLean, 22102, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23

As the most recognized hospitality brand in the industry, guests around the globe rely on us as a trusted place for their stay. With 600+ hotels located in the world’s most exciting destinations, we are the place where people gather to experience exceptional hospitality, inspiring design, and energizing and often award winning bars and restaurants. We Are Hilton. We Are Hospitality.

NAICS: 7211
NAICS Definition: Traveler Accommodation
Employees: 15,563
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1

Holiday Inn Express

Global, US
Last Update: 2026-01-17

An IHG hotel. IHG Hotels & Resorts [LON:IHG, NYSE:IHG (ADRs)] is a global hospitality company, with a purpose to provide True Hospitality for Good. At Holiday Inn Express, we strive to make every interaction you have with us simple, smart and refreshingly engaging. With over 3,000 hotels in 75 different countries, Holiday Inn Express is IHG’s largest brand and one of the fastest growing hotel brands in the industry. Holiday Inn Express offers affordable hotels, high speed internet access, free breakfast and a comfortable room that will leave you relaxed and recharged. InterContinental Hotels Group PLC is the Group’s holding company and is incorporated in Great Britain and registered in England and Wales. Approximately 350,000 people work across IHG's hotels and corporate offices globally. Visit https://www.ihg.com/holidayinnexpress/hotels/us/en/reservation for hotel information and reservations and www.ihgrewards.com for more on IHG One Rewards. For our latest news, follow us on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and Twitter.

NAICS: 7211
NAICS Definition: Traveler Accommodation
Employees: 22,086
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hilton-hotels-and-resorts-brand.jpeg
Hilton Hotels & Resorts
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/holidayinnexpress.jpeg
Holiday Inn Express
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hilton Hotels & Resorts
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Holiday Inn Express
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hilton Hotels & Resorts in 2026.

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Holiday Inn Express in 2026.

Incident History — Hilton Hotels & Resorts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hilton Hotels & Resorts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Holiday Inn Express (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Holiday Inn Express cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hilton-hotels-and-resorts-brand.jpeg
Hilton Hotels & Resorts
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2017
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: denial-of-service malware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 09/2015
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Point-of-Sale System
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2014
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Malware (Point-of-Sale Systems)
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/holidayinnexpress.jpeg
Holiday Inn Express
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Holiday Inn Express company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Hilton Hotels & Resorts company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Hilton Hotels & Resorts company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Holiday Inn Express company has not reported any.

In the current year, Holiday Inn Express company and Hilton Hotels & Resorts company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Holiday Inn Express company nor Hilton Hotels & Resorts company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Hilton Hotels & Resorts company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Holiday Inn Express company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Holiday Inn Express company nor Hilton Hotels & Resorts company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hilton Hotels & Resorts company nor Holiday Inn Express company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hilton Hotels & Resorts nor Holiday Inn Express holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Holiday Inn Express company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Hilton Hotels & Resorts company.

Holiday Inn Express company employs more people globally than Hilton Hotels & Resorts company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitality.

Neither Hilton Hotels & Resorts nor Holiday Inn Express holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hilton Hotels & Resorts nor Holiday Inn Express holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hilton Hotels & Resorts nor Holiday Inn Express holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hilton Hotels & Resorts nor Holiday Inn Express holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hilton Hotels & Resorts nor Holiday Inn Express holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hilton Hotels & Resorts nor Holiday Inn Express holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H