Comparison Overview

Hilton Engineering Inc

VS

Hess Industries, Inc.

Hilton Engineering Inc

2136 Harmony Pl, Saint George, UT, 84790, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

All aspects of day-to-day business sales and administration responsibilities. Performing and documenting ICC code calculations for seismic and wind loading on commercial and residential structures up to 3 stories. Concrete footings and basement-reinforced walls are sized accordingly. This includes the creation of professionally stamped structural design construction drawings of homes. Expert in 3D solid modeling and design of steel structures. Original full documentation provided as well as calculation sets.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Hess Industries, Inc.

30257 Redfield St., Niles, Michigan, 49120, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

In 2013 the Fontijne Grotnes Group acquired the following Intellectual Property of Hess Industries Inc., including: - Cold & Hot Spinning Machines & Systems - Canning Machines & System - Formitt Metal Labs (Prototyping & Production Services) - Sheet Metal Fabrication Machines & Systems (HVAC, Appliances) - Dies - Brake Shoe Welders The newly acquired product portfolio will be positioned as Fontijne Formitt, Inc. and located in the former Hess Industries facility in Niles, Michigan.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hilton-engineering-inc.jpeg
Hilton Engineering Inc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hess-industries-inc..jpeg
Hess Industries, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hilton Engineering Inc
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Hess Industries, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hilton Engineering Inc in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hess Industries, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Hilton Engineering Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hilton Engineering Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Hess Industries, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hess Industries, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hilton-engineering-inc.jpeg
Hilton Engineering Inc
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hess-industries-inc..jpeg
Hess Industries, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Hess Industries, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Hilton Engineering Inc company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Hess Industries, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hilton Engineering Inc company.

In the current year, Hess Industries, Inc. company and Hilton Engineering Inc company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Hess Industries, Inc. company nor Hilton Engineering Inc company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Hess Industries, Inc. company nor Hilton Engineering Inc company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Hess Industries, Inc. company nor Hilton Engineering Inc company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hilton Engineering Inc company nor Hess Industries, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hilton Engineering Inc nor Hess Industries, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Hilton Engineering Inc company nor Hess Industries, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Hess Industries, Inc. company employs more people globally than Hilton Engineering Inc company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Hilton Engineering Inc nor Hess Industries, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hilton Engineering Inc nor Hess Industries, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hilton Engineering Inc nor Hess Industries, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hilton Engineering Inc nor Hess Industries, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hilton Engineering Inc nor Hess Industries, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hilton Engineering Inc nor Hess Industries, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H