Comparison Overview

HCO

VS

CareLink Community Support Services

HCO

76 Hutchinson St, Mount Barker, South Australia, 5251, AU
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

HCO is an independent and not-for-profit specialist disability service provider. We’re built on genuine connections with the people we support and our community. Our highly skilled team work alongside people living with disability and families, to help them live their best life, the way they want. Help enable quality home and community life through: -Supported Independent Living -In-home Support -Short Term Accommodation -Community Access Programs -Support Coordination. We work with children, adults and young people living with disability and their families.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 61
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

CareLink Community Support Services

605 E. Baltimore Pike, Media, PA, 19063, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Since 1959, CareLink has provided individuals living with severe and persistent mental illness unique programs and support to help them achieve wellness, recovery, and self-determination. CareLink’s philosophy is that people with disabilities can live, work, and participate in their community with independence if they have caring support and help learning essential skills. CareLink offers welcoming housing, career and education services, community outreach, and case management for adults in Southeastern PA and NJ. For more information on how you can help support CareLink please visit our website at www.carelinkservices.org.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 146
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hills-community-options-inc.jpeg
HCO
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
HCO
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CareLink Community Support Services
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HCO in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CareLink Community Support Services in 2026.

Incident History — HCO (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HCO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CareLink Community Support Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CareLink Community Support Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hills-community-options-inc.jpeg
HCO
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/carelink-community-support-services.jpeg
CareLink Community Support Services
Incidents

FAQ

HCO company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CareLink Community Support Services company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, CareLink Community Support Services company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to HCO company.

In the current year, CareLink Community Support Services company and HCO company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CareLink Community Support Services company nor HCO company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CareLink Community Support Services company nor HCO company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CareLink Community Support Services company nor HCO company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither HCO company nor CareLink Community Support Services company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither HCO nor CareLink Community Support Services holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither HCO company nor CareLink Community Support Services company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

CareLink Community Support Services company employs more people globally than HCO company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither HCO nor CareLink Community Support Services holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither HCO nor CareLink Community Support Services holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither HCO nor CareLink Community Support Services holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither HCO nor CareLink Community Support Services holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither HCO nor CareLink Community Support Services holds HIPAA certification.

Neither HCO nor CareLink Community Support Services holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N