Comparison Overview

Hiller Aviation Museum

VS

Heritage Museum of Orange County

Hiller Aviation Museum

601 Skyway Road, San Carlos, CA 94070, US
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799

Hiller Aviation Museum uses aviation as a gateway for people to embrace adventure and innovation while using tools of science to explore how the physical world works and how the dream of flight is made into reality. The Hiller Aviation Museum was opened to the public in 1998 by helicopter designer and inventor Stanley Hiller Jr. and features a collection of more than 50 aircraft representing more than a century of aviation history. Interactive exhibits and hands-on demonstrations offer immersive experiences that improve understanding of STEM subjects and are unique resources for nurturing academic success by providing examples of real-world applications of technology. These interactive exhibits include our Invention Lab, Drone Plex, and flight simulators. Core Museum programs for children in grades Pre-K through 12 promote STEM learning and engagement with hands-on activities featuring cutting edge curricula and learning technologies. Programs include: • School Field Trips • Aviation Camp • Aero Design Challenge • Afterschool Aviators (at school and library sites) More than 110,000 visitors experience Hiller Aviation Museum annually, including 57,000 youth. Each year more than 10,000 students, in grades Pre-K through 12 representing 250 different Bay Area schools, visit the Museum on school field trips. About 33% of field trip schools have significant populations of underprivileged youth and visit the Museum at free or reduced cost through our Field Trip Assistance Program, which is underwritten by generous donors. The Museum hosts several major annual events including: Biggest Little Air Show, Smithsonian Museum Day, and Noon Years. The Museum can also be rented for private events, such as corporate functions, birthday parties, weddings, etc. Two major annual fundraisers support the Museum. A Benefit Gala dinner & auction is hosted every fall. The Airport Runway Run 2K/5K/10K walk and run takes place at San Carlos Airport each spring.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 56
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Heritage Museum of Orange County

3101 West Harvard Street, Santa Ana, CA, 92704, US
Last Update: 2026-01-09

The Heritage Museum of Orange County is one of the most interesting cultural and natural history centers in Southern California. The centerpiece of the museum, which covers nearly 12 acres in all, is a historic plaza featuring several buildings from the 1890s set amid extensive floral gardens and citrus groves. Among these is the Kellogg House, familiar to teachers and students throughout Orange County as a favorite field trip destination for nearly 25 years. Our programming offers school children the opportunity to partake in innovative hands-on programs designed to encourage exploratory and imaginative learning. Dedicated to enhancing education, the museum has helped preserve, promote and restore the heritage of Orange County and the surrounding regions since 1985. Over the past decade, the museum has sustained itself by developing a fee-based social service enterprise, and by offering a variety of other activities including public tours, tea parties, themed fundraisers, weddings and corporate events. We are also caretakers of Santa Ana’s last surviving freshwater marsh, a tiny remnant of the extensive wetlands that once existed throughout the lowlands of Orange County.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hiller-aviation-museum.jpeg
Hiller Aviation Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/heritage-museum-of-orange-county.jpeg
Heritage Museum of Orange County
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hiller Aviation Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Heritage Museum of Orange County
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hiller Aviation Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Heritage Museum of Orange County in 2026.

Incident History — Hiller Aviation Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hiller Aviation Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Heritage Museum of Orange County (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Heritage Museum of Orange County cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hiller-aviation-museum.jpeg
Hiller Aviation Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/heritage-museum-of-orange-county.jpeg
Heritage Museum of Orange County
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Hiller Aviation Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Heritage Museum of Orange County company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Heritage Museum of Orange County company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hiller Aviation Museum company.

In the current year, Heritage Museum of Orange County company and Hiller Aviation Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Heritage Museum of Orange County company nor Hiller Aviation Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Heritage Museum of Orange County company nor Hiller Aviation Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Heritage Museum of Orange County company nor Hiller Aviation Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hiller Aviation Museum company nor Heritage Museum of Orange County company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hiller Aviation Museum nor Heritage Museum of Orange County holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Hiller Aviation Museum company nor Heritage Museum of Orange County company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Hiller Aviation Museum company employs more people globally than Heritage Museum of Orange County company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Hiller Aviation Museum nor Heritage Museum of Orange County holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hiller Aviation Museum nor Heritage Museum of Orange County holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hiller Aviation Museum nor Heritage Museum of Orange County holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hiller Aviation Museum nor Heritage Museum of Orange County holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hiller Aviation Museum nor Heritage Museum of Orange County holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hiller Aviation Museum nor Heritage Museum of Orange County holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N