Comparison Overview

Hill Hill Carter Franco Cole & Black, P.C.

VS

SpencePC, IP and Complex Litigation

Hill Hill Carter Franco Cole & Black, P.C.

425 South Perry Street, Montgomery, Alabama, 36104, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Hill Hill Carter offers a full range of legal services, from business planning to complex litigation. The firm is centrally located in Alabama's capital city and represents clients throughout the state and the Southeast. Our goal is to provide sound, practical, and proactive advice to assist our clients in successful planning and avoiding litigation and other adversarial proceedings. When litigation is necessary, we utilize a team approach with the client being an integral part of the team. Working with the client, we evaluate the underlying facts, analyze the legal merits, and develop a sound and true strategy. A prompt and successful resolution through mediation or arbitration, or when necessary, an expedient trial, is our goal. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 52
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

SpencePC, IP and Complex Litigation

515 North State Street, Chicago, IL, 60654, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

SpencePC is a unique law firm that focuses on intellectual property and complex business disputes. Our attorneys possess the necessary technical and legal expertise to successfully resolve litigation, arbitration, mediation, and other contentious administrative proceedings. Most importantly, we offer a unique value proposition that ensures we not only work hard--we also work smart. A note from our founder: “We established our Firm so that individuals and forward-thinking businesses can affordably obtain access to experienced attorneys trained by some of the largest law firms in the country. We are committed to being the best. All law firms are bound by high professional and ethical standards. SpencePC commits itself to one additional standard: Be outstanding in everything we do. Being outstanding means both providing outstanding legal services and doing so in a way that provides outstanding value to our clients. To demonstrate our commitment to these goals, we encourage alternative-fee arrangements that reward success and efficiency, not the time we bill. Thank you for allowing us to demonstrate a better way to obtain legal services.” – William C. Spence

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hill-hill-carter-franco-cole-&-black.jpeg
Hill Hill Carter Franco Cole & Black, P.C.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spence-pc---intellectual-property-litigation.jpeg
SpencePC, IP and Complex Litigation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hill Hill Carter Franco Cole & Black, P.C.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SpencePC, IP and Complex Litigation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hill Hill Carter Franco Cole & Black, P.C. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SpencePC, IP and Complex Litigation in 2025.

Incident History — Hill Hill Carter Franco Cole & Black, P.C. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hill Hill Carter Franco Cole & Black, P.C. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SpencePC, IP and Complex Litigation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SpencePC, IP and Complex Litigation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hill-hill-carter-franco-cole-&-black.jpeg
Hill Hill Carter Franco Cole & Black, P.C.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spence-pc---intellectual-property-litigation.jpeg
SpencePC, IP and Complex Litigation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Hill Hill Carter Franco Cole & Black, P.C. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SpencePC, IP and Complex Litigation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, SpencePC, IP and Complex Litigation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hill Hill Carter Franco Cole & Black, P.C. company.

In the current year, SpencePC, IP and Complex Litigation company and Hill Hill Carter Franco Cole & Black, P.C. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither SpencePC, IP and Complex Litigation company nor Hill Hill Carter Franco Cole & Black, P.C. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither SpencePC, IP and Complex Litigation company nor Hill Hill Carter Franco Cole & Black, P.C. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither SpencePC, IP and Complex Litigation company nor Hill Hill Carter Franco Cole & Black, P.C. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hill Hill Carter Franco Cole & Black, P.C. company nor SpencePC, IP and Complex Litigation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hill Hill Carter Franco Cole & Black, P.C. nor SpencePC, IP and Complex Litigation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Hill Hill Carter Franco Cole & Black, P.C. company nor SpencePC, IP and Complex Litigation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Hill Hill Carter Franco Cole & Black, P.C. company employs more people globally than SpencePC, IP and Complex Litigation company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Hill Hill Carter Franco Cole & Black, P.C. nor SpencePC, IP and Complex Litigation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hill Hill Carter Franco Cole & Black, P.C. nor SpencePC, IP and Complex Litigation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hill Hill Carter Franco Cole & Black, P.C. nor SpencePC, IP and Complex Litigation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hill Hill Carter Franco Cole & Black, P.C. nor SpencePC, IP and Complex Litigation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hill Hill Carter Franco Cole & Black, P.C. nor SpencePC, IP and Complex Litigation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hill Hill Carter Franco Cole & Black, P.C. nor SpencePC, IP and Complex Litigation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X