Comparison Overview

Hightech Signs DFW

VS

GM Graphics

Hightech Signs DFW

undefined, Dallas, Texas, 75235, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://hightechsignshop.com

Our devoted staff has served our customers for over 20 years by creating new and innovative ways of capturing their ideas and imagination. No job is too big or too small, and at Hightech Signs DFW we have fashioned signs, banners and impact graphics for major stadiums, sports arenas, high-end retailers, government agencies and large corporations. In our dealings with television studios and movies crews, we understand more than most that time is critical - an hour late can cost tens of thousands of dollars in lost production time. We proudly apply those same principals to each and every engagement. Our work is guaranteed, and we provide our clients with comprehensive information to extend the life of their products - saving them time and money in the future.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

GM Graphics

531 Clay St, Newaygo, MI, 49337, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gmgraphicssupply.com

GM Graphics is the industry's leading manufacture of screen printing frames, squeegees and seller of select screen printing supplies. We manufacture both wood and aluminum screen printing frames and wood and aluminum handled squeegees all sold at Factory Direct Prices. We have "stock"​ frames and squeegees that will ship the same day if order prior to 3pm est. If they are a "non-stock"​ mesh count they will ship the following day. We stand behind our products 110%!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hightech-signs-dfw.jpeg
Hightech Signs DFW
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gm-graphics.jpeg
GM Graphics
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hightech Signs DFW
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
GM Graphics
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hightech Signs DFW in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GM Graphics in 2025.

Incident History — Hightech Signs DFW (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hightech Signs DFW cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — GM Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GM Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hightech-signs-dfw.jpeg
Hightech Signs DFW
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gm-graphics.jpeg
GM Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Hightech Signs DFW company and GM Graphics company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, GM Graphics company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hightech Signs DFW company.

In the current year, GM Graphics company and Hightech Signs DFW company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither GM Graphics company nor Hightech Signs DFW company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither GM Graphics company nor Hightech Signs DFW company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither GM Graphics company nor Hightech Signs DFW company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hightech Signs DFW company nor GM Graphics company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hightech Signs DFW nor GM Graphics holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Hightech Signs DFW company nor GM Graphics company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

GM Graphics company employs more people globally than Hightech Signs DFW company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Hightech Signs DFW nor GM Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hightech Signs DFW nor GM Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hightech Signs DFW nor GM Graphics holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hightech Signs DFW nor GM Graphics holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hightech Signs DFW nor GM Graphics holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hightech Signs DFW nor GM Graphics holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References