Comparison Overview

Highland Springs

VS

Arbour Hospital

Highland Springs

4199 Mill Pond Dr, Highland Hills, US
Last Update: 2026-01-24

Highland Springs is a 72-bed behavioral health facility in Cleveland offering inpatient and outpatient mental health and addiction treatment to adults and their loved ones. Highland Springs is committed to providing an effective treatment experience and making a difference in the lives of those who seek sobriety and mental wellness.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 169
Subsidiaries: 16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Arbour Hospital

49 Robinwood Avenue , Jamaica Plain, MA, 02130, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

At Arbour Hospital, we work diligently and compassionately to provide patients and their families with high-quality care and service excellence across a continuum of specialized behavioral health services. We have proudly served the residents of the greater Boston area since 1909. Our medical staff consists of psychiatrists who average 20 years of practice at our facility, providing a solid and trusted foundation for our patient-focused approach to behavioral healthcare. Arbour Hospital is an important community resource for a wide range of vital behavioral healthcare services. We treat primary psychiatric and substance abuse disorders and constantly strive to meet the needs of our communities with treatment that address individualized behavioral health needs. We stand ready to provide compassionate care through inpatient treatment and a strong continuum of aftercare services, community-based programs, and day treatment. Call Arbour Hospital at 1-833-2ARBOUR (227-2687) to make a referral. We are available 24/7 to provide no cost, confidential assessments.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 204
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/highland-springs-health.jpeg
Highland Springs
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arbour-hospital.jpeg
Arbour Hospital
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Highland Springs
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Arbour Hospital
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Highland Springs in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Arbour Hospital in 2026.

Incident History — Highland Springs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Highland Springs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Arbour Hospital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Arbour Hospital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/highland-springs-health.jpeg
Highland Springs
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arbour-hospital.jpeg
Arbour Hospital
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Highland Springs company and Arbour Hospital company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Arbour Hospital company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Highland Springs company.

In the current year, Arbour Hospital company and Highland Springs company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Arbour Hospital company nor Highland Springs company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Arbour Hospital company nor Highland Springs company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Arbour Hospital company nor Highland Springs company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Highland Springs company nor Arbour Hospital company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Highland Springs nor Arbour Hospital holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Highland Springs company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Arbour Hospital company.

Arbour Hospital company employs more people globally than Highland Springs company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Highland Springs nor Arbour Hospital holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Highland Springs nor Arbour Hospital holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Highland Springs nor Arbour Hospital holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Highland Springs nor Arbour Hospital holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Highland Springs nor Arbour Hospital holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Highland Springs nor Arbour Hospital holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.