Comparison Overview

Highland Springs

VS

Acadiana Treatment Center

Highland Springs

4199 Mill Pond Dr, Highland Hills, US
Last Update: 2026-01-24

Highland Springs is a 72-bed behavioral health facility in Cleveland offering inpatient and outpatient mental health and addiction treatment to adults and their loved ones. Highland Springs is committed to providing an effective treatment experience and making a difference in the lives of those who seek sobriety and mental wellness.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 169
Subsidiaries: 16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Acadiana Treatment Center

156 Choctaw Rd, Sunset, Louisiana, 70584, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Louisiana’s Choice for Success in Recovery Located in Sunset, Louisiana, Acadiana Treatment Center is the state’s leading psychiatric residential treatment provider for adolescents. Offering residential rehabilitation services for adolescents ages 12-17 of all genders since 2004, Acadiana understands the importance of treating the whole person rather than just their symptoms. As such, we offer comprehensive care based on each adolescent’s needs, taking an evidence-based approach to healing from the following mental health conditions: Anxiety Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) Bipolar disorder Depression Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) Self-harm Depending on each patient’s goals for recovery, programming at Acadiana may include individual, group, family, and experiential therapies, along with medication management services and basic medical care. Our professional staff members are known for unmatched expertise and compassionate care in all they do to support the adolescents and families we care for. To learn more about the types of therapies we provide, or any other aspect of our programming, please reach out at 337-510-4541

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 72
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/highland-springs-health.jpeg
Highland Springs
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/acadiana-treatment-center.jpeg
Acadiana Treatment Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Highland Springs
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Acadiana Treatment Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Highland Springs in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Acadiana Treatment Center in 2026.

Incident History — Highland Springs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Highland Springs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Acadiana Treatment Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Acadiana Treatment Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/highland-springs-health.jpeg
Highland Springs
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/acadiana-treatment-center.jpeg
Acadiana Treatment Center
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Highland Springs company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Acadiana Treatment Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Acadiana Treatment Center company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Highland Springs company has not reported any.

In the current year, Acadiana Treatment Center company and Highland Springs company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Acadiana Treatment Center company nor Highland Springs company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Acadiana Treatment Center company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Highland Springs company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Acadiana Treatment Center company nor Highland Springs company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Highland Springs company nor Acadiana Treatment Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Highland Springs nor Acadiana Treatment Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Acadiana Treatment Center company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Highland Springs company.

Highland Springs company employs more people globally than Acadiana Treatment Center company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Highland Springs nor Acadiana Treatment Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Highland Springs nor Acadiana Treatment Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Highland Springs nor Acadiana Treatment Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Highland Springs nor Acadiana Treatment Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Highland Springs nor Acadiana Treatment Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Highland Springs nor Acadiana Treatment Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.