Comparison Overview

High Court Solutions

VS

Phillips Ryther & Winchester

High Court Solutions

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27

High Court Solutions are a High Court Enforcement company as previously seen on "Can't Pay? We'll Take it Away."​ We have a skilled & dedicated team with the expertise that is necessary in todays market place in order to collect the money owed by debtors. If you have obtained Judgment in the County Court [CCJ] for a sum in excess of £600 this can be Transferred to the High Court for Enforcement at a court cost of £66. Also we undertake Repossession of Properties. Once a Possession Order has been granted in the County Court with permission we can obtain a Writ of Possession from the High Court enabling us to evict your unwanted inhabitants. Need to find an individual, then speak to us. Our Trace facilities can also include enhanced elements such as "Asset Tracing"​, Employment etc. We are hear to help, give us a call to discuss matters. Our philsophy is to provide an excellent and honest service - even if that means we do not get an instruction.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Phillips Ryther & Winchester

None
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Phillips Ryther & Winchester LLC firm represents clients in a wide range of intellectual property related matters. The attorneys of PR&W strive to understand the business goals of the firm's clients in order to develop innovative legal solutions tailored to achieving those goals. The firm represent its clients in the most aggressive and ethical manner possible. In the past 10 years, the firm's attorneys have recovered more than $100 million for their clients, have established valuable legal precedent, and have obtained valuable protection for their clients' most important intellectual and business assets. The firm represent clients ranging from early stage technology companies to large multinational corporations and operating in both emerging and established industries, including automotive, medical devices, computer security and digital rights management software, and smart grid technologies. PR&W represents and has represented clients such as Ford, General Motors, Honda, Volkswagen, Audi, Porsche, Toyota, Volvo, and Hertz in a variety of intellectual property related matters. The attorneys of PR&W believe the goals of excellent legal work and cost effectiveness are not mutually exclusive, but can be achieved by exceptional and efficient attorneys.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/high-court-solutions.jpeg
High Court Solutions
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/phillips-ryther-&-winchester.jpeg
Phillips Ryther & Winchester
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
High Court Solutions
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Phillips Ryther & Winchester
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for High Court Solutions in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Phillips Ryther & Winchester in 2025.

Incident History — High Court Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

High Court Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Phillips Ryther & Winchester (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Phillips Ryther & Winchester cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/high-court-solutions.jpeg
High Court Solutions
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/phillips-ryther-&-winchester.jpeg
Phillips Ryther & Winchester
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Phillips Ryther & Winchester company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to High Court Solutions company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Phillips Ryther & Winchester company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to High Court Solutions company.

In the current year, Phillips Ryther & Winchester company and High Court Solutions company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Phillips Ryther & Winchester company nor High Court Solutions company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Phillips Ryther & Winchester company nor High Court Solutions company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Phillips Ryther & Winchester company nor High Court Solutions company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither High Court Solutions company nor Phillips Ryther & Winchester company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither High Court Solutions nor Phillips Ryther & Winchester holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither High Court Solutions company nor Phillips Ryther & Winchester company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither High Court Solutions nor Phillips Ryther & Winchester holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither High Court Solutions nor Phillips Ryther & Winchester holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither High Court Solutions nor Phillips Ryther & Winchester holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither High Court Solutions nor Phillips Ryther & Winchester holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither High Court Solutions nor Phillips Ryther & Winchester holds HIPAA certification.

Neither High Court Solutions nor Phillips Ryther & Winchester holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X