Comparison Overview

Hidden Horizons Ltd

VS

The Story Museum

Hidden Horizons Ltd

Scarborough, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-16

Established in 2013 by Will Watts, we offer museum consultancy services, covering all areas of museum and heritage operations and we are also developing an exciting range of public and school events based on the outstanding geology and natural history of this part of North Yorkshire. We would love to hear from anybody who has any ideas about how they may want to work with us, or perhaps you just fancy a quick rock-pooling trip, dinosaur footprint hunt or you need a dinosaur session for your school. Our new website is being developed at the moment, but keep up to date with our plans via www.twitter.com/@H_Horizons www.facebook.com/hiddenhorizonsltd www.hiddenhorizonsblog.wordpress.com Hidden Horizons Ltd is a company registered in England & Wales. No. 8817205

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Story Museum

Pembroke Street, Oxford, undefined, OX1 1BP, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-18

The Story Museum is a most unusual museum in the heart of Oxford. The Museum aims to enrich lives, especially young lives, through story. The Museum was established to ensure that everyone can enjoy and benefit from engaging with great stories and create stories of their own in a place full of wit and wonder. Highlights include a Whispering Wood, an Enchanted Library and Small Worlds, a dedicated space for younger children as well as a 100-seat theatre, a learning studio and a temporary exhibition space. In addition to welcoming public visitors and school groups to its Galleries, the Museum also delivers an extensive public programme, including skills courses, workshops, drop-in activities and access visits for those wanting to enjoy the Museum in a more relaxed way, alongside a programme of funded community and school participation projects with targeted groups. The Museum attracts up to 100,000 visitors a year. The Story Museum is a not-for-profit company and registered charity number 1107809. To find out about current job opportunities at The Story Museum, visit: https://www.storymuseum.org.uk/about-us/vacancies To find out about volunteering at The Story Museum, visit: https://www.storymuseum.org.uk/support-us/volunteer To find out about hiring our event spaces, visit: https://www.storymuseum.org.uk/venue-hire To stay up to date with our news and events, follow us on social: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TheStoryMuseum X (formerly twitter): https://twitter.com/TheStoryMuseum Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/thestorymuseum YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/storymuseum

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 43
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-story-museum.jpeg
The Story Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hidden Horizons Ltd
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Story Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hidden Horizons Ltd in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Story Museum in 2026.

Incident History — Hidden Horizons Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hidden Horizons Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Story Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Story Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hidden-horizons-ltd.jpeg
Hidden Horizons Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-story-museum.jpeg
The Story Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Hidden Horizons Ltd company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Story Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Story Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hidden Horizons Ltd company.

In the current year, The Story Museum company and Hidden Horizons Ltd company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Story Museum company nor Hidden Horizons Ltd company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Story Museum company nor Hidden Horizons Ltd company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Story Museum company nor Hidden Horizons Ltd company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hidden Horizons Ltd company nor The Story Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hidden Horizons Ltd nor The Story Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Hidden Horizons Ltd company nor The Story Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Story Museum company employs more people globally than Hidden Horizons Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Hidden Horizons Ltd nor The Story Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hidden Horizons Ltd nor The Story Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hidden Horizons Ltd nor The Story Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hidden Horizons Ltd nor The Story Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hidden Horizons Ltd nor The Story Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hidden Horizons Ltd nor The Story Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N