Comparison Overview

Hidden Horizons Ltd

VS

RMSC (Rochester Museum & Science Center)

Hidden Horizons Ltd

Scarborough, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-24
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.hiddenhorizons.co.uk

Established in 2013 by Will Watts, we offer museum consultancy services, covering all areas of museum and heritage operations and we are also developing an exciting range of public and school events based on the outstanding geology and natural history of this part of North Yorkshire. We would love to hear from anybody who has any ideas about how they may want to work with us, or perhaps you just fancy a quick rock-pooling trip, dinosaur footprint hunt or you need a dinosaur session for your school. Our new website is being developed at the moment, but keep up to date with our plans via www.twitter.com/@H_Horizons www.facebook.com/hiddenhorizonsltd www.hiddenhorizonsblog.wordpress.com Hidden Horizons Ltd is a company registered in England & Wales. No. 8817205

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

RMSC (Rochester Museum & Science Center)

657 East Ave, Rochester, NY, 14607, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://www.rmsc.org

The RMSC includes the RMSC Museum & Science Center, the RMSC Strasenburgh Planetarium, and the RMSC Cumming Nature Center. Offering experiences at the Museum & Science Center with more than 200 interactive exhibits, Planetarium with a 65-foot dome and Nature Center on 900 acres, the RMSC stimulates community interest in exploration. In addition, the more than 1.2 million RMSC collection items tell the story of Rochester’s past including its rich history of innovation and invention. RMSC receives major funding from Monroe County, where it is one of the top three most visited attractions serving children and families. For more information about RMSC, visit www.rmsc.org.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 166
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rochester-museum-&-science-center.jpeg
RMSC (Rochester Museum & Science Center)
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hidden Horizons Ltd
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
RMSC (Rochester Museum & Science Center)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hidden Horizons Ltd in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RMSC (Rochester Museum & Science Center) in 2026.

Incident History — Hidden Horizons Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hidden Horizons Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — RMSC (Rochester Museum & Science Center) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RMSC (Rochester Museum & Science Center) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hidden-horizons-ltd.jpeg
Hidden Horizons Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rochester-museum-&-science-center.jpeg
RMSC (Rochester Museum & Science Center)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Hidden Horizons Ltd company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to RMSC (Rochester Museum & Science Center) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, RMSC (Rochester Museum & Science Center) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hidden Horizons Ltd company.

In the current year, RMSC (Rochester Museum & Science Center) company and Hidden Horizons Ltd company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither RMSC (Rochester Museum & Science Center) company nor Hidden Horizons Ltd company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither RMSC (Rochester Museum & Science Center) company nor Hidden Horizons Ltd company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither RMSC (Rochester Museum & Science Center) company nor Hidden Horizons Ltd company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hidden Horizons Ltd company nor RMSC (Rochester Museum & Science Center) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hidden Horizons Ltd nor RMSC (Rochester Museum & Science Center) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Hidden Horizons Ltd company nor RMSC (Rochester Museum & Science Center) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

RMSC (Rochester Museum & Science Center) company employs more people globally than Hidden Horizons Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Hidden Horizons Ltd nor RMSC (Rochester Museum & Science Center) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hidden Horizons Ltd nor RMSC (Rochester Museum & Science Center) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hidden Horizons Ltd nor RMSC (Rochester Museum & Science Center) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hidden Horizons Ltd nor RMSC (Rochester Museum & Science Center) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hidden Horizons Ltd nor RMSC (Rochester Museum & Science Center) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hidden Horizons Ltd nor RMSC (Rochester Museum & Science Center) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References