Comparison Overview

Hiday & Ricke, PA

VS

Shanghai EverBright Law Firm

Hiday & Ricke, PA

4100 Southpoint Dr. E., Jacksonville, Florida, 32216, US
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 750 and 799

Hiday & Ricke is a statewide Florida law firm specializing in creditors rights. We handle debt collection and subrogation matters for credit unions, insurance companies, banks, and businesses from all over the world. Our services include collections litigation, subrogation, bankruptcy, replevins, and other types of creditor matters. We are an AV rated and AM Best qualified law firm with headquarters in Jacksonville, and offices strategically placed around the state.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 41
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Shanghai EverBright Law Firm

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 800 and 849

Brief Introduction of EverBright Law Firm EverBright Law Firm (hereinafter referred to as “EverBright”) was established in 1994. EverBright is a Chinese law firm with a seasoned professional team based in Shanghai that is licensed to practise in the People’s Republic of China. Our lawyers are well-trained Chinese lawyers, who possess an in-depth knowledge and understanding of laws and regulations of the People’s Republic of China. EverBright’s practice includes advising on all areas of Chinese laws. We are supported by a reputable team of more than 30 associates, enabling us to effectively serve your company and protect your rights and interests in China and overseas. EverBright’s core practice areas include Corporate, Intellectual Property, Litigation and Arbitration, Foreign Direct Investments and Real Estate.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hiday-&-ricke-pa.jpeg
Hiday & Ricke, PA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Shanghai EverBright Law Firm
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hiday & Ricke, PA
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Shanghai EverBright Law Firm
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hiday & Ricke, PA in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Shanghai EverBright Law Firm in 2025.

Incident History — Hiday & Ricke, PA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hiday & Ricke, PA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Shanghai EverBright Law Firm (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Shanghai EverBright Law Firm cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hiday-&-ricke-pa.jpeg
Hiday & Ricke, PA
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Shanghai EverBright Law Firm
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Shanghai EverBright Law Firm company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Hiday & Ricke, PA company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Shanghai EverBright Law Firm company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hiday & Ricke, PA company.

In the current year, Shanghai EverBright Law Firm company and Hiday & Ricke, PA company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Shanghai EverBright Law Firm company nor Hiday & Ricke, PA company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Shanghai EverBright Law Firm company nor Hiday & Ricke, PA company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Shanghai EverBright Law Firm company nor Hiday & Ricke, PA company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hiday & Ricke, PA company nor Shanghai EverBright Law Firm company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hiday & Ricke, PA nor Shanghai EverBright Law Firm holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Hiday & Ricke, PA company nor Shanghai EverBright Law Firm company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Hiday & Ricke, PA company employs more people globally than Shanghai EverBright Law Firm company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Hiday & Ricke, PA nor Shanghai EverBright Law Firm holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hiday & Ricke, PA nor Shanghai EverBright Law Firm holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hiday & Ricke, PA nor Shanghai EverBright Law Firm holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hiday & Ricke, PA nor Shanghai EverBright Law Firm holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hiday & Ricke, PA nor Shanghai EverBright Law Firm holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hiday & Ricke, PA nor Shanghai EverBright Law Firm holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X