Comparison Overview

Hibberts LLP Solicitors

VS

Legadex

Hibberts LLP Solicitors

25 Barker Street, Nantwich, Cheshire, CW5 5EN, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Hibberts LLP is a long-established firm with origins that date back to 1799. With offices in Crewe, Nantwich, Tarporley, Ellesmere and Whitchurch, we are pre-eminent in Cheshire and North Shropshire. Our roots are firmly in the local community and we have an extensive and loyal client base. We pride ourselves in particular on our commitment to personal service and firmly believe that it is this commitment and ethos that draws new clients from diverse fields and in many cases, from far beyond our geographical territory. Whilst we value tradition and personal service, we recognise that these qualities alone are insufficient to meet the challenges of today's legal environment. We constantly seek to improve and update our services and we embrace innovation and information technologies where we see they benefit our clients. We are also conscious that many clients have a wide range of legal needs. The firm is specifically structured as a full-service provider, meaning that we can deal with a huge range of legal matters, but within a local context and on a personal basis.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 61
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Legadex

Antonio Vivaldistraat 64, Amsterdam, 1083 HP, NL
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Legadex is your legal innovation partner with head office in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Legadex helps legal departments with advice, legal tech implementation and flexible staffing to handle their legal work in a more effective and efficient manner. Our team has a strong focus on smart work processes and has partnerships with many of the most innovative legal software providers.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 20
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hibberts-llp.jpeg
Hibberts LLP Solicitors
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/legadex.jpeg
Legadex
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hibberts LLP Solicitors
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Legadex
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hibberts LLP Solicitors in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Legadex in 2025.

Incident History — Hibberts LLP Solicitors (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hibberts LLP Solicitors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Legadex (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Legadex cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hibberts-llp.jpeg
Hibberts LLP Solicitors
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/legadex.jpeg
Legadex
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Hibberts LLP Solicitors company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Legadex company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Legadex company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hibberts LLP Solicitors company.

In the current year, Legadex company and Hibberts LLP Solicitors company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Legadex company nor Hibberts LLP Solicitors company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Legadex company nor Hibberts LLP Solicitors company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Legadex company nor Hibberts LLP Solicitors company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hibberts LLP Solicitors company nor Legadex company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hibberts LLP Solicitors nor Legadex holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Hibberts LLP Solicitors company nor Legadex company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Hibberts LLP Solicitors company employs more people globally than Legadex company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Hibberts LLP Solicitors nor Legadex holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hibberts LLP Solicitors nor Legadex holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hibberts LLP Solicitors nor Legadex holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hibberts LLP Solicitors nor Legadex holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hibberts LLP Solicitors nor Legadex holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hibberts LLP Solicitors nor Legadex holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X