Comparison Overview

Halifax Public Libraries

VS

Folio: The Seattle Athenaeum

Halifax Public Libraries

60 Alderney Drive, Dartmouth, NS, B2Y 4P8, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-22

Halifax Public Libraries comprises 14 branch libraries, a website, and Borrow by Mail and Home Delivery services. The Library serves a population of approximately 400,000 spread over 5,889 sq. km. The collection consists of over 1 million items — including books, magazines, DVDs, CDs and downloadable audiobooks, eBooks and videos. As part of the Nova Scotia Regional Library system, Halifax Public Libraries strongly supports other public libraries, lending more than 6,000 items per year to other libraries, including those in a government or university setting. Vision: Reflecting our community, we are a resource for everyone and a launch point for growth.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 269
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Folio: The Seattle Athenaeum

93 Pike St, Seattle, Washington, 98101, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Folio is a nonprofit member-supported library and cultural center offering cultural and civic conversations, book and art discussions, intimate concerts, a circulating collection of donated books, and accessible work spaces with beautiful views at the heart of the historic Pike Place Market. Folio: The Seattle Athenaeum was founded as a nonprofit Washington corporation in 2014.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hfxpubliib.jpeg
Halifax Public Libraries
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/folio-the-seattle-athenaeum.jpeg
Folio: The Seattle Athenaeum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Halifax Public Libraries
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Folio: The Seattle Athenaeum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Halifax Public Libraries in 2025.

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Folio: The Seattle Athenaeum in 2025.

Incident History — Halifax Public Libraries (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Halifax Public Libraries cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Folio: The Seattle Athenaeum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Folio: The Seattle Athenaeum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hfxpubliib.jpeg
Halifax Public Libraries
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/folio-the-seattle-athenaeum.jpeg
Folio: The Seattle Athenaeum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Halifax Public Libraries company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Folio: The Seattle Athenaeum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Folio: The Seattle Athenaeum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Halifax Public Libraries company.

In the current year, Folio: The Seattle Athenaeum company and Halifax Public Libraries company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Folio: The Seattle Athenaeum company nor Halifax Public Libraries company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Folio: The Seattle Athenaeum company nor Halifax Public Libraries company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Folio: The Seattle Athenaeum company nor Halifax Public Libraries company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Halifax Public Libraries company nor Folio: The Seattle Athenaeum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Halifax Public Libraries nor Folio: The Seattle Athenaeum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Halifax Public Libraries company nor Folio: The Seattle Athenaeum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Halifax Public Libraries company employs more people globally than Folio: The Seattle Athenaeum company, reflecting its scale as a Libraries.

Neither Halifax Public Libraries nor Folio: The Seattle Athenaeum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Halifax Public Libraries nor Folio: The Seattle Athenaeum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Halifax Public Libraries nor Folio: The Seattle Athenaeum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Halifax Public Libraries nor Folio: The Seattle Athenaeum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Halifax Public Libraries nor Folio: The Seattle Athenaeum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Halifax Public Libraries nor Folio: The Seattle Athenaeum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H