Comparison Overview

Hammersmith, Fulham, Ealing and Hounslow Mind (HFEH Mind)

VS

Ujima Psychological Services, PLLC

Hammersmith, Fulham, Ealing and Hounslow Mind (HFEH Mind)

309 Lillie Road, London, SW6 7LL, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Hammersmith, Fulham, Ealing and Hounslow Mind is an independent charity which has been delivering mental health services and support to London residents for over 30 years. Our local community services include Advice and Information, Advocacy, Community Support, Psychoeducation, Services for Children and Young People and more. We also deliver professional mental health training courses and offer consultancy services to businesses, public sector organisations, schools colleges, and charity organisations. We’re here to make sure everyone in our local communities gets the support they need to have better mental health and wellbeing, to recover and to live the best lives possible. We take steps to ensure that our services are available to everyone suffering with a mental health problem. Most of our services can be accessed by referral through your local GP, other health professionals including mental health teams and organisations such as charities, schools and colleges. We also offer ‘self-referral’ services which anyone can apply to directly and are free of charge. For full details of our services and how you can access them, please visit our website. Hammersmith, Fulham, Ealing and Hounslow Mind promotes better mental health and works to challenge stigma and discrimination as a results of mental illness. We’re an independent charity working within quality standards endorsed by the Charity Commission. Reg. charity no. 801259. We’re affiliated with, but receive no charitable funding from the Mind Federation which operates across England and Wales. We’re reliant on support from individuals, businesses and the public sector. We need this support to ensure everyone suffering with a mental health problem gets the support they need to recover. This page is not monitored 24/7.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 78
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Ujima Psychological Services, PLLC

1115 Broadway, None, New York, NY, US, 10010
Last Update:
Between 750 and 799

Our practice recognizes the struggle and unique experience of people with identities that are marginalized. Although some of these identities are social constructs that have been imposed upon us, for many, they represent salient aspects of who we are and how we understand the world. For that reason, our practice was born out of recognizing the need for more healing and wellness spaces for folks from disenfranchised communities. Therapy with providers who understand institutional, systemic, and individual oppression and demonstrate compassion, care, and interest in learning about your uniqueness is the foundation of our approach. Therapy can be a great place to support you in actualizing your most fulfilling and authentic life.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hfehmind.jpeg
Hammersmith, Fulham, Ealing and Hounslow Mind (HFEH Mind)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ujima-psychological-services-pllc.jpeg
Ujima Psychological Services, PLLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hammersmith, Fulham, Ealing and Hounslow Mind (HFEH Mind)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ujima Psychological Services, PLLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hammersmith, Fulham, Ealing and Hounslow Mind (HFEH Mind) in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ujima Psychological Services, PLLC in 2026.

Incident History — Hammersmith, Fulham, Ealing and Hounslow Mind (HFEH Mind) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hammersmith, Fulham, Ealing and Hounslow Mind (HFEH Mind) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ujima Psychological Services, PLLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ujima Psychological Services, PLLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hfehmind.jpeg
Hammersmith, Fulham, Ealing and Hounslow Mind (HFEH Mind)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ujima-psychological-services-pllc.jpeg
Ujima Psychological Services, PLLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Hammersmith, Fulham, Ealing and Hounslow Mind (HFEH Mind) company and Ujima Psychological Services, PLLC company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Ujima Psychological Services, PLLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hammersmith, Fulham, Ealing and Hounslow Mind (HFEH Mind) company.

In the current year, Ujima Psychological Services, PLLC company and Hammersmith, Fulham, Ealing and Hounslow Mind (HFEH Mind) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ujima Psychological Services, PLLC company nor Hammersmith, Fulham, Ealing and Hounslow Mind (HFEH Mind) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Ujima Psychological Services, PLLC company nor Hammersmith, Fulham, Ealing and Hounslow Mind (HFEH Mind) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ujima Psychological Services, PLLC company nor Hammersmith, Fulham, Ealing and Hounslow Mind (HFEH Mind) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hammersmith, Fulham, Ealing and Hounslow Mind (HFEH Mind) company nor Ujima Psychological Services, PLLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hammersmith, Fulham, Ealing and Hounslow Mind (HFEH Mind) nor Ujima Psychological Services, PLLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Hammersmith, Fulham, Ealing and Hounslow Mind (HFEH Mind) company nor Ujima Psychological Services, PLLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Hammersmith, Fulham, Ealing and Hounslow Mind (HFEH Mind) company employs more people globally than Ujima Psychological Services, PLLC company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Hammersmith, Fulham, Ealing and Hounslow Mind (HFEH Mind) nor Ujima Psychological Services, PLLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hammersmith, Fulham, Ealing and Hounslow Mind (HFEH Mind) nor Ujima Psychological Services, PLLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hammersmith, Fulham, Ealing and Hounslow Mind (HFEH Mind) nor Ujima Psychological Services, PLLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hammersmith, Fulham, Ealing and Hounslow Mind (HFEH Mind) nor Ujima Psychological Services, PLLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hammersmith, Fulham, Ealing and Hounslow Mind (HFEH Mind) nor Ujima Psychological Services, PLLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hammersmith, Fulham, Ealing and Hounslow Mind (HFEH Mind) nor Ujima Psychological Services, PLLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N