Comparison Overview

HerringtonPT

VS

Heatstar

HerringtonPT

4400 Calumet Ave, Manitowoc, Wisconsin, 54220, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Herrington PT (power transmission) is an independent manufacturers’ representative agency specializing in electro/mechanical power transmission components. Founded in 1984, we have been serving industrial OEMs and distributors throughout Wisconsin and the upper Midwest. We are sales and marketing professionals who help products move efficiently from the point of manufacture to the point of use. To our customers, we are the manufacturer. We represent manufacturers specializing in gearmotors and reducers, VFD's, motors, engineered chain and sprockets, rubber and polyurethane belts, custom shafting & bearings, linear motion, silicone sealants & adhesives, and conveying systems. In our team based selling environment, we use a disciplined process to track and follow up on opportunities and provide regular updates to our manufacturers.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Heatstar

2 Manners View, Newport, PO30 5FA, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Heatstar is a British specialist manufacturer of heat pump, heat recovery and humidity control systems which are designed exclusively for application on swimming pools. A flag-bearer for energy-efficiency for over three decades, Heatstar continue to play a huge part in making swimming pools both energy and C0² role models. Heatstar have pioneered the innovation, design and development of modern, highly energy efficient, climate control systems and continue to be the renowned market leader in the field.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/herringtonpt.jpeg
HerringtonPT
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/heatstar.jpeg
Heatstar
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
HerringtonPT
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Heatstar
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HerringtonPT in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Heatstar in 2025.

Incident History — HerringtonPT (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HerringtonPT cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Heatstar (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Heatstar cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/herringtonpt.jpeg
HerringtonPT
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/heatstar.jpeg
Heatstar
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

HerringtonPT company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Heatstar company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Heatstar company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to HerringtonPT company.

In the current year, Heatstar company and HerringtonPT company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Heatstar company nor HerringtonPT company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Heatstar company nor HerringtonPT company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Heatstar company nor HerringtonPT company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither HerringtonPT company nor Heatstar company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither HerringtonPT nor Heatstar holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither HerringtonPT company nor Heatstar company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Heatstar company employs more people globally than HerringtonPT company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither HerringtonPT nor Heatstar holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither HerringtonPT nor Heatstar holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither HerringtonPT nor Heatstar holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither HerringtonPT nor Heatstar holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither HerringtonPT nor Heatstar holds HIPAA certification.

Neither HerringtonPT nor Heatstar holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H