Comparison Overview

Heritage Operations Group, LLC

VS

Jefferson Health

Heritage Operations Group, LLC

115 W. Jefferson St. Suite 401, Bloomington, IL, 61701, US
Last Update: 2025-03-04 (UTC)

Strong

At Heritage Operations Group, LLC, we pride ourselves on providing the highest quality nursing facility care for seniors. With over 40 owned and managed eldercare facilities throughout Illinois, our well-trained and compassionate staff work hard to make our residents feel at home, whether it is through the services we provide, the interaction we have, or the time we spend with each individual. Whether you are looking for an occasional extra hand or around-the-clock assistance, Heritage is ready to care for you or your loved one. We offer a wide array of services for seniors in our communities, so they can depend on us, regardless of the specific type of care needed. We are Central Illinois'โ€‹ leader in providing: โ€ข Skilled Nursing Care โ€ข RESTORE Therapy โ€ข Senior Living โ€ข Alzheimer's Care โ€ข Respite Care โ€ข Hospice Care โ€ข Green Tree Pharmacy Visit us at: www.HeritageOfCare.com or www.Facebook.com/HeritageOfCare for more information! Heritage Operations Group, LLC. is a separate and distinct legal entity from any and all other entities named or listed on this website. Any information contained in this website does not constitute evidence of a relationship between Heritage Operations Group, LLC., or any other named or listed entity.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 155
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Jefferson Health

130 South Ninth Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, US
Last Update: 2025-03-04 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900

Thomas Jefferson University and Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals are partners in providing excellent clinical and compassionate care for our patients in the Philadelphia region, educating the health professionals of tomorrow in a variety of disciplines and discovering new knowledge that will define the future of clinical care. Thomas Jefferson University is dedicated to health sciences education and research.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 16,861
Subsidiaries: 15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/heritageoperationsgroup.jpeg
Heritage Operations Group, LLC
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thomas-jefferson-university-hospitals.jpeg
Jefferson Health
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Heritage Operations Group, LLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Jefferson Health
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Heritage Operations Group, LLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jefferson Health in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Heritage Operations Group, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Heritage Operations Group, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Jefferson Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jefferson Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/heritageoperationsgroup.jpeg
Heritage Operations Group, LLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thomas-jefferson-university-hospitals.jpeg
Jefferson Health
Incidents

Date Detected: 01/2021
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2020
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access to Email Accounts
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 08/2020
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Email
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both Heritage Operations Group, LLC company and Jefferson Health company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Jefferson Health company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Heritage Operations Group, LLC company has not reported any.

In the current year, Jefferson Health company and Heritage Operations Group, LLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Jefferson Health company nor Heritage Operations Group, LLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Jefferson Health company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Heritage Operations Group, LLC company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Jefferson Health company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Heritage Operations Group, LLC company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Heritage Operations Group, LLC company nor Jefferson Health company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Jefferson Health company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Heritage Operations Group, LLC company.

Jefferson Health company employs more people globally than Heritage Operations Group, LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

FreshRSS is a free, self-hostable RSS aggregator. Versions 1.26.3 and below do not sanitize certain event handler attributes in feed content, so by finding a page that renders feed entries without CSP, it is possible to execute an XSS payload. The Allow API access authentication setting needs to be enabled by the instance administrator beforehand for the attack to work as it relies on api/query.php. An account takeover is possible by sending a change password request via the XSS payload / setting UserJS for persistence / stealing the autofill password / displaying a phishing page with a spoofed URL using history.replaceState() If the victim is an administrator, the attacker can also perform administrative actions. This issue is fixed in version 1.27.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

go-f3 is a Golang implementation of Fast Finality for Filecoin (F3). In versions 0.8.6 and below, go-f3 panics when it validates a "poison" messages causing Filecoin nodes consuming F3 messages to become vulnerable. A "poison" message can can cause integer overflow in the signer index validation, which can cause the whole node to crash. These malicious messages aren't self-propagating since the bug is in the validator. An attacker needs to directly send the message to all targets. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.7.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

go-f3 is a Golang implementation of Fast Finality for Filecoin (F3). In versions 0.8.8 and below, go-f3's justification verification caching mechanism has a vulnerability where verification results are cached without properly considering the context of the message. An attacker can bypass justification verification by submitting a valid message with a correct justification and then reusing the same cached justification in contexts where it would normally be invalid. This occurs because the cached verification does not properly validate the relationship between the justification and the specific message context it's being used with. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.9.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L
Description

mkdocs-include-markdown-plugin is an Mkdocs Markdown includer plugin. In versions 7.1.7 and below, there is a vulnerability where unvalidated input can collide with substitution placeholders. This issue is fixed in version 7.1.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
Description

go-mail is a comprehensive library for sending mails with Go. In versions 0.7.0 and below, due to incorrect handling of the mail.Address values when a sender- or recipient address is passed to the corresponding MAIL FROM or RCPT TO commands of the SMTP client, there is a possibility of wrong address routing or even ESMTP parameter smuggling. For successful exploitation, it is required that the user's code allows for arbitrary mail address input (i. e. through a web form or similar). If only static mail addresses are used (i. e. in a config file) and the mail addresses in use do not consist of quoted local parts, this should not affect users. This issue is fixed in version 0.7.1

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X