Comparison Overview

Heritage Preservation

VS

Dixon Gallery & Gardens

Heritage Preservation

None
Last Update: 2026-01-21

Our Mission: To preserve the nation’s heritage for future generations through innovative leadership, education, and programs. Heritage Preservation is a national nonprofit dedicated to preserving the cultural, historic, and scientific heritage of the United States. By identifying risks, developing innovative programs, and providing broad public access to expert advice, Heritage Preservation assists the museums, libraries, archives, organizations, and individuals that care for our endangered heritage.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Dixon Gallery & Gardens

4339 Park Ave, Memphis, Tennessee, 38117-4698, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1976 by Hugo and Margaret Dixon, the Dixon Gallery and Gardens is a fine art museum and public garden distinguished by its diverse and innovative programs in the arts and horticulture. The Dixon features a permanent collection of over 2,000 objects, including French and American Impressionist paintings and significant holdings of German and English porcelain. The museum organizes and presents eight to ten exhibitions every year, the diversity of which appeals to visitors of all ages. The Dixon’s seventeen acre campus is highly regarded public garden that includes formal spaces, woodland tracts, and cutting gardens. The Dixon is accredited by the American Association Museums and is a member of the American Public Gardens Association and Botanical Gardens Conservation International.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 54
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/heritage-preservation.jpeg
Heritage Preservation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Heritage Preservation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Dixon Gallery & Gardens
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Heritage Preservation in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dixon Gallery & Gardens in 2026.

Incident History — Heritage Preservation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Heritage Preservation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Dixon Gallery & Gardens (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dixon Gallery & Gardens cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/heritage-preservation.jpeg
Heritage Preservation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dixon-gallery-&-gardens.jpeg
Dixon Gallery & Gardens
Incidents

FAQ

Both Heritage Preservation company and Dixon Gallery & Gardens company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Dixon Gallery & Gardens company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Heritage Preservation company.

In the current year, Dixon Gallery & Gardens company and Heritage Preservation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Dixon Gallery & Gardens company nor Heritage Preservation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Dixon Gallery & Gardens company nor Heritage Preservation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Dixon Gallery & Gardens company nor Heritage Preservation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Heritage Preservation company nor Dixon Gallery & Gardens company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Heritage Preservation nor Dixon Gallery & Gardens holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Heritage Preservation company nor Dixon Gallery & Gardens company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Dixon Gallery & Gardens company employs more people globally than Heritage Preservation company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Heritage Preservation nor Dixon Gallery & Gardens holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Heritage Preservation nor Dixon Gallery & Gardens holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Heritage Preservation nor Dixon Gallery & Gardens holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Heritage Preservation nor Dixon Gallery & Gardens holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Heritage Preservation nor Dixon Gallery & Gardens holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Heritage Preservation nor Dixon Gallery & Gardens holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.