Comparison Overview

Heritage Park Historical Village

VS

Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture)

Heritage Park Historical Village

1900 Heritage Drive S.W., Calgary, Alberta, T2V 2X3, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

Heritage Park is one of Canada’s largest living history museums, with hundreds of exhibits, rides, shops, restaurants and daily demonstrations and activities to keep the young and the young-at-heart captivated in the past. Experiencing history is a year-round possibility. October to May is the Park’s winter operating season, during which you can explore the rare collection of vintage vehicles and petroliana in Gasoline Alley Museum and the charming shops and restaurants in the Heritage Town Square free zone, located before the Park gates. In the summer operating season, from May to October, the Heritage Town Square free zone, Gasoline Alley Museum and the bustling Historical Village are all open.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 233
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture)

1048 Washington Street, Cape May, NJ, 08204, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) is a multi-faceted non-profit organization that promotes the restoration, interpretation and cultural enrichment of greater Cape May for its residents and visitors. With a membership of more than 3,200, a paid staff of 160 and some 300 volunteers, Cape May MAC offers a year-round calendar of tours and special events that serves more than 300,000 people each year. Through its sponsorship of cultural and heritage tourism, Cape May MAC has helped transform Cape May from a "summer only"​ beach resort to the country's leading Victorian theme destination. Cape May MAC was formed in September, 1970 by a small group of Cape May citizens with the express purpose of rescuing the 1879 Emlen Physick Estate, an 18 room mansion, from demolition. Their campaign to preserve not only the Physick Estate but Victorian architectural treasures throughout Cape May has played a vital role in revitalizing the nation's oldest seaside resort

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 39
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/heritage-park-historical-village.jpeg
Heritage Park Historical Village
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mid-atlantic-center-for-the-arts-&-humanities.jpeg
Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Heritage Park Historical Village
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Heritage Park Historical Village in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) in 2025.

Incident History — Heritage Park Historical Village (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Heritage Park Historical Village cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/heritage-park-historical-village.jpeg
Heritage Park Historical Village
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mid-atlantic-center-for-the-arts-&-humanities.jpeg
Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Heritage Park Historical Village company and Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Heritage Park Historical Village company.

In the current year, Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) company and Heritage Park Historical Village company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) company nor Heritage Park Historical Village company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) company nor Heritage Park Historical Village company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) company nor Heritage Park Historical Village company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Heritage Park Historical Village company nor Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Heritage Park Historical Village nor Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Heritage Park Historical Village company nor Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Heritage Park Historical Village company employs more people globally than Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Heritage Park Historical Village nor Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Heritage Park Historical Village nor Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Heritage Park Historical Village nor Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Heritage Park Historical Village nor Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Heritage Park Historical Village nor Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Heritage Park Historical Village nor Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X