Comparison Overview

Heritage Clinic

VS

Challenge Behavioral Healthcare

Heritage Clinic

447 N El Molino Ave, Pasadena, California, 91101, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

We provide mental health services to adults 55+ and their families, who are experiencing a life transition, stress, anxiety, depression, loss or other difficult issues. We serve individuals whose mental health issues range from mild anxiety and depression to bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and severe or major depression. Services are tailored to address the unique needs of each individual.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 81
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Challenge Behavioral Healthcare

None
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Challenge Behavioral Healthcare is an experienced and caring provider of mental health, substance abuse, and DUI treatment programs. Our system of care, which is well known for its compassionate and structured treatment, emphasizes the importance of caring for a person's concerns and needs in full. With over 20,000 clients and patients who found recovery since its inception in 1991, our mission remains the same: To offer ethical, compassionate and comprehensive treatment in the most cost-effective manner. Further, it is our commitment to restore mental health and well-being, and remain consistent with exemplary service.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/heritage-clinic.jpeg
Heritage Clinic
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Challenge Behavioral Healthcare
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Heritage Clinic
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Challenge Behavioral Healthcare
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Heritage Clinic in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Challenge Behavioral Healthcare in 2026.

Incident History — Heritage Clinic (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Heritage Clinic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Challenge Behavioral Healthcare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Challenge Behavioral Healthcare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/heritage-clinic.jpeg
Heritage Clinic
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Challenge Behavioral Healthcare
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Heritage Clinic company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Challenge Behavioral Healthcare company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Challenge Behavioral Healthcare company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Heritage Clinic company.

In the current year, Challenge Behavioral Healthcare company and Heritage Clinic company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Challenge Behavioral Healthcare company nor Heritage Clinic company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Challenge Behavioral Healthcare company nor Heritage Clinic company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Challenge Behavioral Healthcare company nor Heritage Clinic company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Heritage Clinic company nor Challenge Behavioral Healthcare company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Heritage Clinic nor Challenge Behavioral Healthcare holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Heritage Clinic company nor Challenge Behavioral Healthcare company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Heritage Clinic company employs more people globally than Challenge Behavioral Healthcare company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Heritage Clinic nor Challenge Behavioral Healthcare holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Heritage Clinic nor Challenge Behavioral Healthcare holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Heritage Clinic nor Challenge Behavioral Healthcare holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Heritage Clinic nor Challenge Behavioral Healthcare holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Heritage Clinic nor Challenge Behavioral Healthcare holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Heritage Clinic nor Challenge Behavioral Healthcare holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.