Comparison Overview

Hepro.us

VS

Medline Industries, LP

Hepro.us

325 East 10th Court, Hialeah, Florida, 33010, US
Last Update: 2025-03-07 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

Our company is FDA licensed and our brand name is registered with the US Patent and Trademark office and market quality products.We distribute wholesale disposable medical supplies such as Syringes, Gloves, Glucose-meters, Test Strips, etc. Here at HEPRO.US we want to give you the highest quality products at the best price, making health-care more affordable.

NAICS: 339
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Medline Industries, LP

Three Lakes Drive, Northfield, IL, 60093, US
Last Update: 2025-03-04 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900

Medline is the largest provider of medical-surgical products and supply chain solutions serving all points of care. Through its unique offering of world-class products, supply chain resilience and clinical practice expertise, Medline delivers improved clinical, financial and operational outcomes. Headquartered in Northfield, Illinois, the company employs 43,000 people worldwide and operates in over 100 countries and territories. To learn more about how Medline makes healthcare run better, visit www.medline.com.

NAICS: 3391
NAICS Definition: Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing
Employees: 16,474
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hepro-us.jpeg
Hepro.us
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/medline-industries.jpeg
Medline Industries, LP
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Hepro.us
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Medline Industries, LP
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hepro.us in 2025.

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Medline Industries, LP in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Hepro.us (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hepro.us cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Medline Industries, LP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Medline Industries, LP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hepro-us.jpeg
Hepro.us
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/medline-industries.jpeg
Medline Industries, LP
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Hepro.us company company demonstrates a stronger AI risk posture compared to Medline Industries, LP company company, reflecting its advanced AI governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Medline Industries, LP company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hepro.us company.

In the current year, Medline Industries, LP company and Hepro.us company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Medline Industries, LP company nor Hepro.us company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Medline Industries, LP company nor Hepro.us company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Medline Industries, LP company nor Hepro.us company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hepro.us company nor Medline Industries, LP company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Medline Industries, LP company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Hepro.us company.

Medline Industries, LP company employs more people globally than Hepro.us company, reflecting its scale as a Medical Equipment Manufacturing.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Protection Against Voltage and Clock Glitches in FPGA devices, could allow an attacker with physical access to undervolt the platform resulting in a loss of confidentiality.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Malicious code was inserted into the Nx (build system) package and several related plugins. The tampered package was published to the npm software registry, via a supply-chain attack. Affected versions contain code that scans the file system, collects credentials, and posts them to GitHub as a repo under user's accounts.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In versions from 2.1.0 to before 2.3.0, the API endpoint GET /api/problems/:id returns challenge hints in plaintext within the question object, regardless of whether the user has unlocked them via point deduction. Users can view all hints for free, undermining the business logic of the platform and reducing the integrity of the challenge system. This issue has been patched in version 2.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In version 2.1.0, the /api/admin/assign-badge endpoint lacks proper access control, allowing any authenticated user to assign high-privilege badges (e.g., Staff) to themselves. This could lead to privilege escalation and impersonation of administrative roles. This issue has been patched in version 2.2.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

parse is a package designed to parse JavaScript SDK. A Prototype Pollution vulnerability in the SingleInstanceStateController.initializeState function of parse version 5.3.0 and before allows attackers to inject properties on Object.prototype via supplying a crafted payload, causing denial of service (DoS) as the minimum consequence.