Comparison Overview

Henry Hyams Solicitors

VS

Burden Swart & Botha Inc

Henry Hyams Solicitors

Oxford House, Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS1 3BE, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

A legal practice with expertise across the full range of legal services, we are able to provide insightful and effective advice to private and commercial clients in matters as diverse as personal injury, property, driving offences, divorce and everything in between. Professional and approachable, our solicitors are friendly and down to earth. This allows us to form better relationships with clients and ensures that our advice is specifically tailored to achieve the best possible outcome based on your individual circumstances and requirements.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 44
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Burden Swart & Botha Inc

480 William St, Brooklyn, Pretoria, 0011, ZA
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Burden Swart & Botha Attorneys live by the promise to offer clients service excellence. First established as Andrew Burden Attorneys in 1994, the name was changed to Burden & Swart Attorneys in 2005 and as of November 2013 they continue into the future under the new name Burden Swart & Botha Attorneys. Burden Swart & Botha Attorneys, from Pretoria East, specialise in general litigation, debt collection, commercial, conveyancing and notarial matters, administration of deceased estates, divorces, family matters and sequestrations.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/henry-hyams-solicitors.jpeg
Henry Hyams Solicitors
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/burden-swart-botha-attorneys.jpeg
Burden Swart & Botha Inc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Henry Hyams Solicitors
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Burden Swart & Botha Inc
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Henry Hyams Solicitors in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Burden Swart & Botha Inc in 2025.

Incident History — Henry Hyams Solicitors (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Henry Hyams Solicitors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Burden Swart & Botha Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Burden Swart & Botha Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/henry-hyams-solicitors.jpeg
Henry Hyams Solicitors
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/burden-swart-botha-attorneys.jpeg
Burden Swart & Botha Inc
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Henry Hyams Solicitors company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Burden Swart & Botha Inc company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Burden Swart & Botha Inc company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Henry Hyams Solicitors company.

In the current year, Burden Swart & Botha Inc company and Henry Hyams Solicitors company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Burden Swart & Botha Inc company nor Henry Hyams Solicitors company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Burden Swart & Botha Inc company nor Henry Hyams Solicitors company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Burden Swart & Botha Inc company nor Henry Hyams Solicitors company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Henry Hyams Solicitors company nor Burden Swart & Botha Inc company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Henry Hyams Solicitors nor Burden Swart & Botha Inc holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Henry Hyams Solicitors company nor Burden Swart & Botha Inc company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Henry Hyams Solicitors company employs more people globally than Burden Swart & Botha Inc company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Henry Hyams Solicitors nor Burden Swart & Botha Inc holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Henry Hyams Solicitors nor Burden Swart & Botha Inc holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Henry Hyams Solicitors nor Burden Swart & Botha Inc holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Henry Hyams Solicitors nor Burden Swart & Botha Inc holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Henry Hyams Solicitors nor Burden Swart & Botha Inc holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Henry Hyams Solicitors nor Burden Swart & Botha Inc holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X