Comparison Overview

Hennelly & Grossfeld LLP

VS

International Law Partners

Hennelly & Grossfeld LLP

4640 Admiralty Way #850, Marina del Rey, CA, 90292, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Hennelly & Grossfeld is a law firm specializing in civil trial practice. Founded in 1993, our firm has fifteen attorneys in offices located in California and Arizona. Our attorneys have expertise in a wide range of practice areas including business and commercial litigation, intellectual property, product liability, real estate and title disputes, trade secrets and unfair competition, corporate and partnership disputes, employment, and entertainment litigation. We are dedicated to providing our clients with excellent legal representation at a reasonable cost. To accomplish that and to meet our clients’ goals, we work closely with our clients and keep them involved in every stage of the case. Our goal at Hennelly & Grossfeld is to build and maintain long term relationships with our clients. We are fortunate to count among our clients Fortune 500 companies, medium and small companies, business executives and other individuals. We believe our result-oriented, cost-effective approach, our thorough preparation, and our attention to our clients’ needs are the essential elements of our success. Although the firm retains his name, John J. Hennelly is no longer associated with the firm. Kenneth B. Grossfeld, 1958-2011

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

International Law Partners

2122 Hollywood Blvd, Hollywood, 33020, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

ILP is a boutique law firm assisting our clients in the areas of international & US business transactions, personal injury claims, real estate transactions and simple to complex civil litigation. Our lawyers and staff go to great lengths to provide quality legal services with a personal approach to every client.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hennelly-&-grossfeld-llp.jpeg
Hennelly & Grossfeld LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/international-law-partners.jpeg
International Law Partners
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hennelly & Grossfeld LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
International Law Partners
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hennelly & Grossfeld LLP in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for International Law Partners in 2025.

Incident History — Hennelly & Grossfeld LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hennelly & Grossfeld LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — International Law Partners (X = Date, Y = Severity)

International Law Partners cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hennelly-&-grossfeld-llp.jpeg
Hennelly & Grossfeld LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/international-law-partners.jpeg
International Law Partners
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Hennelly & Grossfeld LLP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to International Law Partners company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, International Law Partners company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hennelly & Grossfeld LLP company.

In the current year, International Law Partners company and Hennelly & Grossfeld LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither International Law Partners company nor Hennelly & Grossfeld LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither International Law Partners company nor Hennelly & Grossfeld LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither International Law Partners company nor Hennelly & Grossfeld LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hennelly & Grossfeld LLP company nor International Law Partners company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hennelly & Grossfeld LLP nor International Law Partners holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Hennelly & Grossfeld LLP company nor International Law Partners company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Hennelly & Grossfeld LLP company employs more people globally than International Law Partners company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Hennelly & Grossfeld LLP nor International Law Partners holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hennelly & Grossfeld LLP nor International Law Partners holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hennelly & Grossfeld LLP nor International Law Partners holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hennelly & Grossfeld LLP nor International Law Partners holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hennelly & Grossfeld LLP nor International Law Partners holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hennelly & Grossfeld LLP nor International Law Partners holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X