Comparison Overview

Hempacco Co, Inc.

VS

Culligan International

Hempacco Co, Inc.

9925 Airway Dr. , None, San Diego, California, US, 92154
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

Hempacco is Disrupting Tobacco’s™ $1 Trillion industry with hemp-based alternatives to cigarettes by manufacturing and marketing consumer goods. The company owns research and development, manufacturing and sales of smokable hemp brands, including The Real Stuff™ Hemp Smokables. Hempacco’s profit centers include private label agreements, Intellectual Property licensing, and the development and sales of their brands using patented counter displays as well as six hundred Kiosk vending machines called HempBoxes™. Besides owning and manufacturing its own name brand, Hempacco also provides private-label services for smokable products and CBD automated retail concepts with vending machines. Hempacco’s mission is to be the most recognized name brand of Hemp Smokable products in the world. Investor Relations: For more information on The Real Stuff™ hemp smokables, private label hemp cigarettes, CBD vending machines or to contact investor relations just call or email: Phone: (775) 473 1201 Email: [email protected]

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Culligan International

9399 W. Higgins Rd. Ste 1100 Rosemont, IL 60018, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26

There’s nothing more fundamental to life on Earth than water. That’s why Culligan believes if we can transform water, we can transform the world. With better science and better service, we change what’s possible for more people. Better drinking water for more neighborhoods and families. More sustainable practices for the planet. And more solutions to make more lives better. We turn water you can live with into water you can love.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hempacco.jpeg
Hempacco Co, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/culligan-international.jpeg
Culligan International
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hempacco Co, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Culligan International
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Consumer Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hempacco Co, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Consumer Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Culligan International in 2025.

Incident History — Hempacco Co, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hempacco Co, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Culligan International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Culligan International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hempacco.jpeg
Hempacco Co, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/culligan-international.jpeg
Culligan International
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Culligan International company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Hempacco Co, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Culligan International company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hempacco Co, Inc. company.

In the current year, Culligan International company and Hempacco Co, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Culligan International company nor Hempacco Co, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Culligan International company nor Hempacco Co, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Culligan International company nor Hempacco Co, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hempacco Co, Inc. company nor Culligan International company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hempacco Co, Inc. nor Culligan International holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Hempacco Co, Inc. company nor Culligan International company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Culligan International company employs more people globally than Hempacco Co, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Consumer Goods.

Neither Hempacco Co, Inc. nor Culligan International holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hempacco Co, Inc. nor Culligan International holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hempacco Co, Inc. nor Culligan International holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hempacco Co, Inc. nor Culligan International holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hempacco Co, Inc. nor Culligan International holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hempacco Co, Inc. nor Culligan International holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H