Comparison Overview

Hemlock Printers

VS

Landa Digital Printing

Hemlock Printers

7050 Buller Ave, Burnaby, British Columbia, V5J 4S4, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

North America’s top brands trust Hemlock for their printing needs. We deliver superior results through expert craftsmanship, advanced technology and sustainable print practices, with locations in Vancouver BC, Seattle WA, and San Francisco CA. Our 80,000 square foot printing facility houses five Heidelberg sheed-fed conventional and UV presses, two HP Indigo Digital Presses and a full-service bindery, producing a diverse array of products including marketing materials, publications, books, corporate communications and fine art prints. Hemlock’s talented team stays true to the company’s fundamental values of quality and innovation.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 136
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Landa Digital Printing

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, IL
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Landa Digital Printing was founded by Benny Landa with the purpose of liberating printers from the barriers inherent to traditional digital and conventional analog printing. Thanks to Landa’s unique Nanography® technology, Landa Nanographic Printing® Presses produce stunning images of extensive color range, designed to print at any run length, on coated or uncoated media, and in fast turnaround times.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 567
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hemlock-printers.jpeg
Hemlock Printers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/landa-digital-printing.jpeg
Landa Digital Printing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hemlock Printers
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Landa Digital Printing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hemlock Printers in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Landa Digital Printing in 2025.

Incident History — Hemlock Printers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hemlock Printers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Landa Digital Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Landa Digital Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hemlock-printers.jpeg
Hemlock Printers
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/landa-digital-printing.jpeg
Landa Digital Printing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Landa Digital Printing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Hemlock Printers company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Landa Digital Printing company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hemlock Printers company.

In the current year, Landa Digital Printing company and Hemlock Printers company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Landa Digital Printing company nor Hemlock Printers company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Landa Digital Printing company nor Hemlock Printers company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Landa Digital Printing company nor Hemlock Printers company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hemlock Printers company nor Landa Digital Printing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hemlock Printers nor Landa Digital Printing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Hemlock Printers company nor Landa Digital Printing company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Landa Digital Printing company employs more people globally than Hemlock Printers company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Hemlock Printers nor Landa Digital Printing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hemlock Printers nor Landa Digital Printing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hemlock Printers nor Landa Digital Printing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hemlock Printers nor Landa Digital Printing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hemlock Printers nor Landa Digital Printing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hemlock Printers nor Landa Digital Printing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N