Comparison Overview

Helton Law Group, APC

VS

North Carolina Bar Foundation

Helton Law Group, APC

1590 Corporate Dr, Costa Mesa, California, 92626, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Helton Law Group is an innovative legal resource center created to support and strengthen hospital revenue cycle operations. Founded over 20 years ago, Helton's mission has always been to make healthcare better for everyone - and we do that every day by helping our clients resolve reimbursement issues, contract in ways to avoid problems, and strengthen payor/provider relationships in the process. Helton works closely with its provider clients to preserve margins by improving systems, identifying inefficiencies and shortening the revenue cycle on future similar claims. Helton supports and focuses on its client’s revenue cycle priorities, objectives and initiatives. Helton complies with all 2021 federal compliance and California state labor laws.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 102
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

North Carolina Bar Foundation

8000 Weston Pkwy , Cary, North Carolina , 27513, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

The North Carolina Bar Foundation is the charitable arm of the North Carolina Bar Association. Through the North Carolina Bar Foundation, North Carolina attorneys support a philanthropic culture of giving by volunteering their time and making monetary donations in support of law-related public service and pro bono programs and activities. The North Carolina Bar Foundation’s Endowment provides grants to organizations and projects in North Carolina that are engaged in law-related education, access to justice, and pro bono service activities.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/helton-law-group.jpeg
Helton Law Group, APC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/northcarolinabarfoundation.jpeg
North Carolina Bar Foundation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Helton Law Group, APC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
North Carolina Bar Foundation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Helton Law Group, APC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for North Carolina Bar Foundation in 2025.

Incident History — Helton Law Group, APC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Helton Law Group, APC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — North Carolina Bar Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

North Carolina Bar Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/helton-law-group.jpeg
Helton Law Group, APC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/northcarolinabarfoundation.jpeg
North Carolina Bar Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Helton Law Group, APC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to North Carolina Bar Foundation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, North Carolina Bar Foundation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Helton Law Group, APC company.

In the current year, North Carolina Bar Foundation company and Helton Law Group, APC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither North Carolina Bar Foundation company nor Helton Law Group, APC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither North Carolina Bar Foundation company nor Helton Law Group, APC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither North Carolina Bar Foundation company nor Helton Law Group, APC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Helton Law Group, APC company nor North Carolina Bar Foundation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Helton Law Group, APC nor North Carolina Bar Foundation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Helton Law Group, APC company nor North Carolina Bar Foundation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Helton Law Group, APC company employs more people globally than North Carolina Bar Foundation company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Helton Law Group, APC nor North Carolina Bar Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Helton Law Group, APC nor North Carolina Bar Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Helton Law Group, APC nor North Carolina Bar Foundation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Helton Law Group, APC nor North Carolina Bar Foundation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Helton Law Group, APC nor North Carolina Bar Foundation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Helton Law Group, APC nor North Carolina Bar Foundation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X