Comparison Overview

Helse Sør-Øst RHF

VS

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Helse Sør-Øst RHF

Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 650 and 699

South Eastern Norway Regional health Authority is a merger between the former Eastern and South regional Health Authority. Responsible for secondary healthcare services for the south-eastern parts of Norway 2.5 million people (approx 52% of population) cost containment budget 58 billion Nkr. 100% state-owned trust with full legal and financial responsibilities, own board and non-political CEO/management. Integrated payer and provider with a two-fold responsibility: Own and operate hospitals as efficiently as possible Provide region with high quality secondary care services (through own hospitals, private hospitals or hospitals in other regions) Ambitious turnaround program with 5 main elements; Hospital structure and service reconfiguration, Research strategy, IT and support services, Best practice management Mobilizing staff and leaders

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 24,140
Subsidiaries: 13
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, US, 10065
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

The people of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK) are united by a singular mission: ending cancer for life. Our specialized care teams provide personalized, compassionate, expert care to patients of all ages. Informed by basic research done at our Sloan Kettering Institute, scientists across MSK collaborate to conduct innovative translational and clinical research that is driving a revolution in our understanding of cancer as a disease and improving the ability to prevent, diagnose, and treat it. MSK is dedicated to training the next generation of scientists and clinicians, who go on to pursue our mission at MSK and around the globe. One of the world’s most respected comprehensive centers devoted exclusively to cancer, we have been recognized as one of the top two cancer hospitals in the country by U.S. News & World Report for more than 30 years.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 19,458
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/helse-sor-ost-rhf.jpeg
Helse Sør-Øst RHF
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/memorial-sloan-kettering-cancer-center.jpeg
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Helse Sør-Øst RHF
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

Helse Sør-Øst RHF has 33.33% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in 2025.

Incident History — Helse Sør-Øst RHF (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Helse Sør-Øst RHF cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/helse-sor-ost-rhf.jpeg
Helse Sør-Øst RHF
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Breach
Motivation: Financial gain (identity theft, fraud), Potential chaos (if state-sponsored), Data monetization on dark web
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 01/2018
Type:Breach
Motivation: Cyber espionage to obtain information about politicians, government employees, and members of the armed forces.
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/memorial-sloan-kettering-cancer-center.jpeg
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Helse Sør-Øst RHF company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Helse Sør-Øst RHF company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company has not reported any.

In the current year, Helse Sør-Øst RHF company has reported more cyber incidents than Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company.

Neither Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company nor Helse Sør-Øst RHF company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Helse Sør-Øst RHF company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company nor Helse Sør-Øst RHF company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Helse Sør-Øst RHF company nor Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Helse Sør-Øst RHF nor Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Helse Sør-Øst RHF company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company.

Helse Sør-Øst RHF company employs more people globally than Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Helse Sør-Øst RHF nor Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Helse Sør-Øst RHF nor Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Helse Sør-Øst RHF nor Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Helse Sør-Øst RHF nor Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Helse Sør-Øst RHF nor Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Helse Sør-Øst RHF nor Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H