Comparison Overview

Illinois Helpline

VS

Minnesota Alliance of Recovery Community Organizations

Illinois Helpline

Springfield, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

The Helpline is the only statewide, public resource for finding substance use treatment and recovery services in Illinois. The Helpline refers to hundreds of treatment and recovery providers across Illinois, and we don’t operate any treatment programs. Helpline services are always free and confidential. Our goal is to guide you to the treatment options that are best for you. The Helpline is 24/7/365, confidential resource information and referral hub for connecting Folx to harm reduction, treatment/recovery and support information and services across the state.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Minnesota Alliance of Recovery Community Organizations

Saint Paul, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Founded by leaders of Minnesota’s grassroots Recovery Community Organizations (RCOs), MARCO is a statewide nonprofit organization working to build an ecosystem of recovery. We believe that long-term system change starts in our communities and that RCOs are essential partners in building a recovery-oriented society. Our mission is to educate, advocate, and mobilize resources to grow the community-based recovery movement across Minnesota.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/helplineil.jpeg
Illinois Helpline
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marco-mn.jpeg
Minnesota Alliance of Recovery Community Organizations
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Illinois Helpline
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Minnesota Alliance of Recovery Community Organizations
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Illinois Helpline in 2025.

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Minnesota Alliance of Recovery Community Organizations in 2025.

Incident History — Illinois Helpline (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Illinois Helpline cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Minnesota Alliance of Recovery Community Organizations (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Minnesota Alliance of Recovery Community Organizations cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/helplineil.jpeg
Illinois Helpline
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access (Email & SharePoint)
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marco-mn.jpeg
Minnesota Alliance of Recovery Community Organizations
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Illinois Helpline company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Minnesota Alliance of Recovery Community Organizations company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Illinois Helpline company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Minnesota Alliance of Recovery Community Organizations company has not reported any.

In the current year, Minnesota Alliance of Recovery Community Organizations company and Illinois Helpline company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Minnesota Alliance of Recovery Community Organizations company nor Illinois Helpline company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Illinois Helpline company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Minnesota Alliance of Recovery Community Organizations company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Minnesota Alliance of Recovery Community Organizations company nor Illinois Helpline company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Illinois Helpline company nor Minnesota Alliance of Recovery Community Organizations company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Illinois Helpline nor Minnesota Alliance of Recovery Community Organizations holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Illinois Helpline company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Minnesota Alliance of Recovery Community Organizations company.

Neither Illinois Helpline nor Minnesota Alliance of Recovery Community Organizations holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Illinois Helpline nor Minnesota Alliance of Recovery Community Organizations holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Illinois Helpline nor Minnesota Alliance of Recovery Community Organizations holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Illinois Helpline nor Minnesota Alliance of Recovery Community Organizations holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Illinois Helpline nor Minnesota Alliance of Recovery Community Organizations holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Illinois Helpline nor Minnesota Alliance of Recovery Community Organizations holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H