Comparison Overview

Helping Moon Counseling, P.A.

VS

Homewood Health

Helping Moon Counseling, P.A.

6919 SW 18th St, Boca Raton, 33433, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Helping Moon Counseling is a family owned business. For several years, I had my own private practice. After a few years of doing this on my own, I realized that I would be able to help more people if we grew the business. Together, my husband and I decided that we were going to expand the business and hire more therapists on the team. We hand-picked every person on the team, and we feel that we have incredible professionals working with us. Mental health is such an important aspect of life, and we wanted to create a center where everyone can find a therapist who can help them. If you decide to give us a call, we can guarantee that we will do everything we can to help you find the perfect therapist for you. It’s not always easy to find the right fit. At Helping Moon Counseling, we encourage you to let us know if you feel like the therapist you are assigned to does not feel like the right fit for you, so we can match you up with someone else. We practice as a team, much like a family, where we are here to help one another to make sure that YOU – our client – gets the BEST care possible. We have a team of licensed therapists and student interns directly supervised by myself because we want to make sure every person can have accessibility to the best mental health care. We have specialists for almost all areas of mental health, as well. If we don’t have what you are looking for, we will be happy to offer you some outside referrals. To find out if we can help you or someone you love, just call our office manager Pamela for a free 10-15 conversation where she can evaluate who on the team would be the perfect fit for you. In addition, you can also read the profiles of our therapists and reach out with the name you have in mind. We are looking forward to being part of your journey for change or healing. You are never alone when you are a part of our extended family.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Homewood Health

Last Update: 2026-01-13

As Canada's leader in mental health and addiction services, we provide a continuum of stay at work, return to work and treatment services through our team of over 4,500 staff and clinical professionals. Homewood services focus on helping people and organizations get better. With over 130 years of experience in mental health and addictions, we create, innovate, and collaborate everyday to improve our care and improve lives

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 1,237
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/helping-moon-counseling-p.a..jpeg
Helping Moon Counseling, P.A.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/homewood-health.jpeg
Homewood Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Helping Moon Counseling, P.A.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Homewood Health
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Helping Moon Counseling, P.A. in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Homewood Health in 2026.

Incident History — Helping Moon Counseling, P.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Helping Moon Counseling, P.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Homewood Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Homewood Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/helping-moon-counseling-p.a..jpeg
Helping Moon Counseling, P.A.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/homewood-health.jpeg
Homewood Health
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2021
Type:Data Leak
Motivation: Financial, Disruption
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Helping Moon Counseling, P.A. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Homewood Health company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Homewood Health company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Helping Moon Counseling, P.A. company has not reported any.

In the current year, Homewood Health company and Helping Moon Counseling, P.A. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Homewood Health company nor Helping Moon Counseling, P.A. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Homewood Health company nor Helping Moon Counseling, P.A. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Homewood Health company nor Helping Moon Counseling, P.A. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Helping Moon Counseling, P.A. company nor Homewood Health company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Helping Moon Counseling, P.A. nor Homewood Health holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Homewood Health company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Helping Moon Counseling, P.A. company.

Homewood Health company employs more people globally than Helping Moon Counseling, P.A. company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Helping Moon Counseling, P.A. nor Homewood Health holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Helping Moon Counseling, P.A. nor Homewood Health holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Helping Moon Counseling, P.A. nor Homewood Health holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Helping Moon Counseling, P.A. nor Homewood Health holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Helping Moon Counseling, P.A. nor Homewood Health holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Helping Moon Counseling, P.A. nor Homewood Health holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N