Comparison Overview

HELLO! Magazine

VS

Forbes

HELLO! Magazine

Wellington House, London, SE1 9PQ, GB
Last Update: 2026-03-31
Between 750 and 799

Since its launch in 1988, HELLO! magazine has established itself as a publishing phenomenon. Its unique format and editorial structure have won numerous accolades and awards. Renowned for its superb celebrity photo-features, and its ability to secure exclusive access to the social elite makes HELLO! one of the leading women's weekly magazines in the UK. To complement the iconic magazine, HELLO! launched their website, HELLO! Online, in 2001 which brings daily royal, celebrity, fashion and lifestyle news to their readers, with even more exclusive content and celebrity interviews.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 226
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Forbes

Jersey City, NJ, US
Last Update: 2026-04-03
Between 800 and 849

Forbes Media is a global media, branding and technology company, with a focus on news and information about business, investing, technology, entrepreneurship, leadership and affluent lifestyles. The company publishes Forbes, Forbes Asia, and Forbes Europe magazines as well as Forbes.com. The Forbes brand today reaches more than 94 million people worldwide with its business message each month through its magazines and 37 licensed local editions around the globe, Forbes.com, TV, conferences, research, social and mobile platforms. Forbes Media’s brand extensions include conferences, real estate, education, financial services, and technology license agreements. Forbes is an equal opportunity employer.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 10,065
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hello-magazine.jpeg
HELLO! Magazine
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/forbes-magazine.jpeg
Forbes
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
HELLO! Magazine
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Forbes
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HELLO! Magazine in 2026.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Forbes in 2026.

Incident History — HELLO! Magazine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HELLO! Magazine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Forbes (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Forbes cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hello-magazine.jpeg
HELLO! Magazine
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/forbes-magazine.jpeg
Forbes
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Forbes company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to HELLO! Magazine company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Forbes company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas HELLO! Magazine company has not reported any.

In the current year, Forbes company and HELLO! Magazine company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Forbes company nor HELLO! Magazine company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Forbes company nor HELLO! Magazine company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Forbes company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while HELLO! Magazine company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither HELLO! Magazine company nor Forbes company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither HELLO! Magazine nor Forbes holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Forbes company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to HELLO! Magazine company.

Forbes company employs more people globally than HELLO! Magazine company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither HELLO! Magazine nor Forbes holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither HELLO! Magazine nor Forbes holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither HELLO! Magazine nor Forbes holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither HELLO! Magazine nor Forbes holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither HELLO! Magazine nor Forbes holds HIPAA certification.

Neither HELLO! Magazine nor Forbes holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H