Comparison Overview

FORVIA HELLA

VS

DENSO

FORVIA HELLA

Rixbecker Strasse 75, Lippstadt, undefined, 59552, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.hella.com

FORVIA HELLA is a listed international automotive supplier. As a company of the FORVIA Group, FORVIA HELLA stands for high-performance lighting technology and vehicle electronics and, with the Lifecycle Solutions Business Group, also covers a broad service and product portfolio for the spare parts and workshop business as well as for manufacturers of special vehicles. With currently around 36,500 employees at over 125 locations, the Company is active worldwide and generated adjusted sales of €8.1 billion on a preliminary basis in the fiscal year 2024. www.forvia-hella.com Legal notice: https://www.hella.com/legalnotice Data protection notice: https://www.hella.com/hella-com/en/Data-protection-65.html

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 16,961
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

DENSO

24777 Denso Dr, Southfield, Michigan, US, 48033
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
https://www.denso.com/us-ca/en/

DENSO is one of the world's largest automotive suppliers with a 75-year history of providing advanced automotive systems and technology to automakers worldwide. While our products are featured on nearly every vehicle make and model on the road today, we're also looking to innovate beyond automotive so we can maximize how we support the evolving needs of society. Globally, we have 158,000 employees, including 27,000+ in North America, working together every day to pursue our Two Great Causes: Green -- which represents our goal of achieving carbon neutrality by 2035 through our products, processes and facilities; and Peace of Mind -- which focuses on developing solutions for safer and more seamless experiences across society. Together, they help us pursue our mission of contributing to a better world.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 17,533
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hella.jpeg
FORVIA HELLA
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/denso.jpeg
DENSO
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
FORVIA HELLA
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
DENSO
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FORVIA HELLA in 2025.

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DENSO in 2025.

Incident History — FORVIA HELLA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FORVIA HELLA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — DENSO (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DENSO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hella.jpeg
FORVIA HELLA
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/denso.jpeg
DENSO
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2021
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Data theft and ransom
Blog: Blog

FAQ

FORVIA HELLA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to DENSO company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

DENSO company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas FORVIA HELLA company has not reported any.

In the current year, DENSO company and FORVIA HELLA company have not reported any cyber incidents.

DENSO company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while FORVIA HELLA company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither DENSO company nor FORVIA HELLA company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither DENSO company nor FORVIA HELLA company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither FORVIA HELLA company nor DENSO company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither FORVIA HELLA nor DENSO holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

FORVIA HELLA company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to DENSO company.

DENSO company employs more people globally than FORVIA HELLA company, reflecting its scale as a Motor Vehicle Manufacturing.

Neither FORVIA HELLA nor DENSO holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither FORVIA HELLA nor DENSO holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither FORVIA HELLA nor DENSO holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither FORVIA HELLA nor DENSO holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither FORVIA HELLA nor DENSO holds HIPAA certification.

Neither FORVIA HELLA nor DENSO holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References