Comparison Overview

FORVIA HELLA

VS

BMW Group

FORVIA HELLA

Rixbecker Strasse 75, Lippstadt, undefined, 59552, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

FORVIA HELLA is a listed international automotive supplier. As a company of the FORVIA Group, FORVIA HELLA stands for high-performance lighting technology and vehicle electronics and, with the Lifecycle Solutions Business Group, also covers a broad service and product portfolio for the spare parts and workshop business as well as for manufacturers of special vehicles. With currently around 36,500 employees at over 125 locations, the Company is active worldwide and generated adjusted sales of €8.1 billion on a preliminary basis in the fiscal year 2024. www.forvia-hella.com Legal notice: https://www.hella.com/legalnotice Data protection notice: https://www.hella.com/hella-com/en/Data-protection-65.html

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 16,961
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

BMW Group

Petuelring 130, Munich, DE, 80788
Last Update: 2025-12-09

With its four brands BMW, MINI, Rolls-Royce and BMW Motorrad, the BMW Group is the world’s leading pre-mium manufacturer of automobiles and motorcycles and also provides premium financial services. The BMW Group production network comprises over 30 production sites worldwide; the company has a global sales network in more than 140 countries. In 2024, the BMW Group sold over 2.45 million passenger vehicles and more than 210,000 motorcycles worldwide. The profit before tax in the financial year 2024 was € 11.0 billion on revenues amounting to € 142.4 billion. As of 31 December 2024, the BMW Group had a workforce of 159,104 employees. The economic success of the BMW Group has always been based on long-term thinking and responsible action. Sustainability is a key element of the BMW Group’s corporate strategy and covers all products from the supply chain and production to the end of their useful life.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 48,747
Subsidiaries: 75
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hella.jpeg
FORVIA HELLA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bmw-group.jpeg
BMW Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
FORVIA HELLA
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
BMW Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FORVIA HELLA in 2025.

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

BMW Group has 66.67% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — FORVIA HELLA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FORVIA HELLA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — BMW Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BMW Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hella.jpeg
FORVIA HELLA
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bmw-group.jpeg
BMW Group
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: financial extortion, cybercrime
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 03/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Misconfiguration
Motivation: Reconnaissance
Blog: Blog

FAQ

FORVIA HELLA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to BMW Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

BMW Group company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas FORVIA HELLA company has not reported any.

In the current year, BMW Group company has reported more cyber incidents than FORVIA HELLA company.

BMW Group company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while FORVIA HELLA company has not reported such incidents publicly.

BMW Group company has disclosed at least one data breach, while FORVIA HELLA company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither BMW Group company nor FORVIA HELLA company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither FORVIA HELLA company nor BMW Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither FORVIA HELLA nor BMW Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

BMW Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to FORVIA HELLA company.

BMW Group company employs more people globally than FORVIA HELLA company, reflecting its scale as a Motor Vehicle Manufacturing.

Neither FORVIA HELLA nor BMW Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither FORVIA HELLA nor BMW Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither FORVIA HELLA nor BMW Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither FORVIA HELLA nor BMW Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither FORVIA HELLA nor BMW Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither FORVIA HELLA nor BMW Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N